Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Relationships between Knowledge of Chicken Production Systems and Advocacy by Animal Protection Workers

Bibliographic Data

ID12419355
AuthorsTim Ro (0000-0002-6664-711X, Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland GattonAustralia, corresponding author), Clive J C Phillips (Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland GattonAustralia), Clive Phillips (0000-0002-1926-6357, Animal Welfare Institute)
Year2017
Volume26
Issue1
Pages73-92
Publication date2017-06-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociety and Animals (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1063-1119 • E-ISSN: 1568-5306
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/15685306-12341463
OpenAlexW2693092797
LanguageEN
References cited11

Animal protection organizations expect their staff to understand and support high welfare standards in animal production. Relationships between Australian animal protection organization workers’ knowledge of chicken production systems, purchasing behavior, and opinion-leading behavior were investigated. Forty-five percent of knowledge questions were answered correctly. Knowledge was mostly gained from animal protection organizations and online literature. Knowledgeable respondents were more critical of both conventional and free range/organic chicken systems and were more likely to avoid eating chicken meat, but not eggs. They were more likely to approach those responsible, in government or industry, about welfare issues and were more likely to discuss animal welfare issues at work and in a social setting. They were also more likely to ask questions about animal welfare standards of food provided at butchers, farmers’ markets, social meals, and restaurants/cafés. Therefore, knowledge was linked to advocacy for improved animal welfare by animal protection organization workers

Animal welfare · Biology · Business · Economics · Government (linguistics · Political science · Production (economics · Public economics · Public relations · Purchasing · Welfare · Work (physics · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Engineering · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Law · Organic Food and Agriculture · Marketing

  • Gender Differences in Human–Animal Interactions

    Harold A Herzog•Anthrozoös•2007

  • Reducing Meat Consumption in Today’s Consumer Society

    Open Access•Erik de Bakker, Hans Dagevos•Journal of Agricultural and…•2011

  • Tracing the Profile of Animal Rights Supporters

    Colin Jerolmack•Society and Animals•2003

  • Support for Animal Rights as a Function of Belief in Evolution, Religious Fundamentalism, and Religious Denomination

    Cassandra Aebersold, Luke W Galen et al.•Society and Animals•2007

  • Students as subjects in food advertising studies. An appraisal of appropriateness

    Open Access•Hojoon Choi, Leonard N Reid•Appetite•2014

  • Consumers and animal welfare. A comparison between European Union countries

    Open Access•Luiza Toma, Alistair W Stott et al.•Appetite•2012

  • Managing Impressions

    Open Access•Jessica B Greenebaum, Jessica Greenebaum•Humanity & Society•2012

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae