Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tentative steps towards interaction

The use of the Internet in the British European Parliament Election 2009

Bibliographic Data

ID12420274
AuthorsNigel Jackson (0000-0003-1674-8649, University of Plymouth, corresponding author), Darren G Lilleker (0000-0003-0403-8121, Bournemouth University)
Year2010
Volume20
Issue5
Pages527-544
Publication date2010-10-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternet Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1066-2243 • E-ISSN: 2054-5657
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/10662241011084103
OpenAlexW1562657254
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited24

Purpose This study seeks to discover whether the existence of Web 2.0 applications introduced a more interactive approach to British parties and candidates’ use of the Internet during the 2009 European Parliament elections. Design/methodology/approach Research data were based on content analysis of the web sites of British candidates and parties during the 2009 European Parliament elections. The conceptual framework assesses whether there is evidence of a monologic versus dialogic approach, and normalisation versus equalisation between parties. Findings The paper finds that parties were not using Web 2.0 as a strategic device. The party list system meant that parties were twice as likely as candidates to use Web 2.0 applications and, overall, there is weak evidence of a third way of ebb and flow. Continuing the experience of previous elections there is evidence of a predominantly monologic approach; however, the debate is no longer simply between normalisation versus equalisation, a more sophisticated approach suggests a third way, where political campaigning has been altered. While the overall levels of interactivity and dialogue are not high, there is some evidence of the development of a Web 1.5 sphere offering more interaction, but within a controlled environment. This study notes that ideology is a factor, where it is the right wing parties which are most likely to adopt interactivity. Originality/value Previous literature on elections in general, and the European Parliament elections specifically, suggest that in the UK the Internet is primarily used for monologic communication and supporting the normalisation thesis. This study suggests, within an era of Web 2.0, a slight refinement to this interpretation

Dialogic · Ideology · Interactivity · Originality · Parliament · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · The Internet · Value (mathematics · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Law · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Social Capital and Networks · Social Media and Politics

  • Towards a More Participatory Style of Election Campaigning

    Open Access•Darren G Lilleker, Nigel Jackson et al.•Policy & Internet•2010

  • The People’s Assembly

    Open Access•Ülle Toode•Online Journal of Communication…•2020

  • Online Political Communication Strategies

    Darren G Lilleker, Karolina Koc-Michalska•Journal of Information Technology…•2012

  • Facebook affordances and citizen engagement during elections

    Karolina Koc-Michalska, Darren G Lilleker et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2020

  • Social Media and the Paradox of Fear

    Michael Parsons, Martyn Rowling•Journal of Political Marketing•2015

  • Fostering Dialogue or Monologue? Estonian Party Websites During the 2009 European Parliament Elections

    Ülle Toode•Journal of Political Marketing•2016

  • Comparing online campaigning

    Open Access•Darren G Lilleker•French Politics•2016

  • Web campaigning in the 2009 European Parliament elections

    Open Access•Maurice Vergeer, Liesbeth Hermans et al.•New Media & Society•2012

  • Campaigning on Twitter

    Open Access•Maurice Vergeer, Liesbeth Hermans•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2013

  • Web sites for e‐electioneering in Maharashtra and Gujarat, India

    Open Access•Rahul Gadekar, Kiran Thakur et al.•Internet Research•2011

  • Politics as Usual

    Michael Margolis, David Resnick•Politics as Usual•2000

  • Political Change in Britain

    Open Access•David Butler, Donald Stokes et al.•Political Change in Britain•1974

  • Political Change in Britain

    Open Access•David Butler, Donald Stokes•Political Change In Britain•1971

  • Cyberdemocracy and Online Politics

    Open Access•Paul Ferber, Franz Foltz et al.•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2007

  • On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It

    Open Access•Jennifer Stromer-Galley, Jennifer Stromer‐galley•Journal of Communication•2000

  • Norwegian Parties and Web 2.0

    Øyvind Kalnes•Journal of Information Technology…•2009

  • Building an Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain

    Nigel Jackson, Nigel A Jackson et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2009

  • MPs and web technologies

    Open Access•Nigel Jackson•Journal of Public Affairs•2003

  • A four-part model of cyber-interactivity

    Sally J Mcmillan•New Media & Society•2002

  • From the air to the ground

    Open Access•C Vaccari•New Media & Society•2008

  • On-Line and on Message? Candidate Websites in the 2001 General Election

    Open Access•Stephen J A Ward, Stephen Ward et al.•The British Journal of Politics…•2003

  • An outsider's medium? The European elections and UK party competition on the internet

    R Gibson, Stephen J A Ward et al.•Journal of Elections Public…•2000

  • Politics Makes Strange Bedfellows”

    Open Access•Wainer Lusoli, Janelle Ward•Harvard International Journal of…•2005

  • Political parties, the Internet and the 2005 General Election

    Open Access•Nigel Jackson•Internet Research•2007

  • Weblog Campaigning in the German Bundestag Election 2005

    Open Access•Steffen Albrecht, Maren Lübcke et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2007

  • The Internet and Political Mobilization

    Open Access•Bruce Bimber•Social Science Computer Review•1998

  • Election Campaigning Online

    Open Access•Eva Johanna Schweitzer•European Journal of Communication•2005

  • Innovation or Normalization in E-Campaigning

    Open Access•Eva Johanna Schweitzer•European Journal of Communication•2008

  • Interactivity-as-Product and Interactivity-as-Process

    Jennifer Stromer-Galley, Jennifer Stromer‐galley•The Information Society•2004

  • Election Campaigning on the WWW in the USA and UK

    Open Access•Rachel Gibson, Rachel K Gibson et al.•Party Politics•2003

  • Keeping Up with the Murphys? Candidate Cyber-campaigning in the 2007 Irish General Election

    Maria Laura Sudulich, Matthew Walls et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2009

  • Surfing citizens and floating voters

    Marcel Boogers, Gerrit Voerman•Information Polity•2003

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0,63
Citation span2010 - 2020 (11)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae