Tentative steps towards interaction
The use of the Internet in the British European Parliament Election 2009
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12420274 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nigel Jackson (0000-0003-1674-8649, University of Plymouth, corresponding author), Darren G Lilleker (0000-0003-0403-8121, Bournemouth University) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 527-544 |
| Publication date | 2010-10-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Internet Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1066-2243 • E-ISSN: 2054-5657 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/10662241011084103 |
| OpenAlex | W1562657254 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 24 |
Purpose This study seeks to discover whether the existence of Web 2.0 applications introduced a more interactive approach to British parties and candidates’ use of the Internet during the 2009 European Parliament elections. Design/methodology/approach Research data were based on content analysis of the web sites of British candidates and parties during the 2009 European Parliament elections. The conceptual framework assesses whether there is evidence of a monologic versus dialogic approach, and normalisation versus equalisation between parties. Findings The paper finds that parties were not using Web 2.0 as a strategic device. The party list system meant that parties were twice as likely as candidates to use Web 2.0 applications and, overall, there is weak evidence of a third way of ebb and flow. Continuing the experience of previous elections there is evidence of a predominantly monologic approach; however, the debate is no longer simply between normalisation versus equalisation, a more sophisticated approach suggests a third way, where political campaigning has been altered. While the overall levels of interactivity and dialogue are not high, there is some evidence of the development of a Web 1.5 sphere offering more interaction, but within a controlled environment. This study notes that ideology is a factor, where it is the right wing parties which are most likely to adopt interactivity. Originality/value Previous literature on elections in general, and the European Parliament elections specifically, suggest that in the UK the Internet is primarily used for monologic communication and supporting the normalisation thesis. This study suggests, within an era of Web 2.0, a slight refinement to this interpretation
Dialogic · Ideology · Interactivity · Originality · Parliament · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · The Internet · Value (mathematics · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Law · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Social Capital and Networks · Social Media and Politics
Towards a More Participatory Style of Election Campaigning
The People’s Assembly
Online Political Communication Strategies
Facebook affordances and citizen engagement during elections
Social Media and the Paradox of Fear
Fostering Dialogue or Monologue? Estonian Party Websites During the 2009 European Parliament Elections
Comparing online campaigning
Web campaigning in the 2009 European Parliament elections
Campaigning on Twitter
Web sites for e‐electioneering in Maharashtra and Gujarat, India
Politics as Usual
Political Change in Britain
Political Change in Britain
Cyberdemocracy and Online Politics
On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It
Norwegian Parties and Web 2.0
Building an Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain
MPs and web technologies
A four-part model of cyber-interactivity
From the air to the ground
On-Line and on Message? Candidate Websites in the 2001 General Election
An outsider's medium? The European elections and UK party competition on the internet
Politics Makes Strange Bedfellows”
Political parties, the Internet and the 2005 General Election
Weblog Campaigning in the German Bundestag Election 2005
The Internet and Political Mobilization
Election Campaigning Online
Innovation or Normalization in E-Campaigning
Interactivity-as-Product and Interactivity-as-Process
Election Campaigning on the WWW in the USA and UK
Keeping Up with the Murphys? Candidate Cyber-campaigning in the 2007 Irish General Election
Surfing citizens and floating voters
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,63 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2020 (11) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |