Understanding knowledge management phenomena in virtual communities from a goal-directed approach

Bibliographic Data

ID12420530
AuthorsShih‐Wei Chou (0000-0001-6449-3172, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, corresponding author), Meng-Jun Hsu (0000-0003-1175-1478, Shu-Te University), Chia-Shiang Hsu, Jiun‐Yan Shiau (0000-0002-0401-5168, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology), Jiun-Yan Shiau, Ming-Kung Huang (National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology), Yi An Chou (National Taiwan University), Yi Chou
Year2018
Volume28
Issue3
Pages652-674
Publication date2018-04-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternet Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1066-2243 • E-ISSN: 2054-5657
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/intr-05-2017-0200
OpenAlexW2797595408
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited29

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand the formation of knowledge management (KM) decisions, including intention for knowledge contribution and knowledge exploration. The authors build on the goal-directed model and a trust-based lens to develop a belief-trust-decision framework. The authors theorize belief as individual factors (one’s virtual skill) and environmental factors (cooperative norms, familiarity), and trust as emotional trust and cognitive trust. Individual factors represent one’s virtual skill to control knowledge exchange, while environmental factors reflect the level of support/control for this exchange by the context. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a survey method to collect data and partial least squares to analyze them. Findings The authors found that KM decision is affected by two types of trust, directly or indirectly. They are, in turn, influenced by individual factors and environmental factors. Research limitations/implications Generalizability of the findings to virtual communities with different collaboration protocol deserves further investigation. This study contributes to the research on KM and social behavior by providing a comprehensive explanation on KM decision through one’s goal achievement in knowledge exchange behavior, in terms of trust development. Besides, the authors theorize one’s belief on knowledge exchange as skill-control and context-control to represent the drivers for trust. Practical implications The results provide suggestion for managers regarding how skill-control and context-control should be managed to improve trust development, which serves as goal achievement for KM decisions. Originality/value The authors extend prior work by yielding a new insight into how and why one’s beliefs on skill-control and context-control for knowledge exchange are transferred into KM decision through one’s goal achievement, characterized as trust development at both emotional and cognitive levels

Context (archaeology · Control (management · Generalizability theory · Knowledge management · Originality · Computer Science · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Knowledge Management and Sharing · Psychology · Social Psychology · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub