Social media as a living laboratory for researchers
The relationship between linguistics and online user responses
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12420533 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aulona Ulqinaku (0000-0003-3456-6451, University of Leeds, corresponding author), Selma Kadić-Maglajlić (0000-0002-1169-1623, Copenhagen Business School), Gülen Sarial‐Abi (0000-0002-7971-959X, Copenhagen Business School) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1744-1774 |
| Publication date | 2023-12-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Internet Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1066-2243 • E-ISSN: 2054-5657 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/intr-01-2023-0064 |
| OpenAlex | W4389740223 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 78 |
Purpose Today, individuals use social media to express their opinions and feelings, which offers a living laboratory to researchers in various fields, such as management, innovation, technology development, environment and marketing. It is therefore necessary to understand how the language used in user-generated content and the emotions conveyed by the content affect responses from other social media users. Design/methodology/approach In this study, almost 700,000 posts from Twitter (as well as Facebook, Instagram and forums in the appendix) are used to test a conceptual model grounded in signaling theory to explain how the language of user-generated content on social media influences how other users respond to that communication. Findings Extending developments in linguistics, this study shows that users react negatively to content that uses self-inclusive language. This study also shows how emotional content characteristics moderate this relationship. The additional information provided indicates that while most of the findings are replicated, some results differ across social media platforms, which deserves users' attention. Originality/value This article extends research on Internet behavior and social media use by providing insights into how the relationship between self-inclusive language and emotions affects user responses to user-generated content. Furthermore, this study provides actionable guidance for researchers interested in capturing phenomena through the social media landscape
Affect (linguistics · Feeling · Originality · Social media · The Internet · User-generated content · Value (mathematics · World Wide Web · Communication · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research
Narrative Processing
An examination of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory's nomological network
Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use
Emotional Arousal and Memory Binding
Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets
The secret life of pronouns
Signaling Theory
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
Beyond valence
“We Shall Overcome”
Type A Behavior, Self-Involvement, and Cardiovascular Response
Investigating the determinants of medical crowdfunding performance
Tweeting #Leaders
Language Use and Personality during Crises
Does affect induce self-focused attention
Self-reference and the encoding of personal information
The effect of metaphor on processing style in a persuasion task
I” am more concrete than “we
Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations
Moderators of the Impact of Self-Reference on Persuasion
Effects of Self-Referencing on Persuasion
Language and Consumer Memory
Selection Bias in Choice of Words
Word of Mouth versus Word of Mouse
Expression Modalities
Let Me Show You What I Did versus What I Have
How Concrete Language Shapes Customer Satisfaction
I Don't" versus "I Can't
Enjoy! Hedonic Consumption and Compliance with Assertive Messages
Self-Referencing and Persuasion
Activating Sound and Meaning
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |