Antecedent of purchase intention
Online seller reputation, product category and surcharge
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12420575 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ming‐Chuan Pan (Tatung University, corresponding author), Chih‐Ying Kuo (Tatung University), Ching‐Ti Pan (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University), Wei Tu (0000-0002-2222-5302, Tatung (Taiwan)) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 507-522 |
| Publication date | 2013-08-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Internet Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1066-2243 • E-ISSN: 2054-5657 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/intr-09-2012-0175 |
| OpenAlex | W2012768279 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 26 |
Purpose This paper aims to examine the antecedent of purchase intention: online seller reputation, product category and surcharge. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses five experimental designs to explore the seller reputation, product category and surcharge effects in Internet shopping. The authors chose one seller of low reputation and one seller of high reputation from Yahoo Mall. ANOVA are used to evaluate the results. Findings Sellers of high reputation can post higher surcharges to increase the total price paid by the buyer, but sellers of low reputation cannot do so (experiment 1). Moreover, partitioned price will decrease purchase intention for sellers of low reputation more than for sellers of high reputation (experiment 2). Consumers take the longest time to make purchasing decisions when buying credence goods (experiment 3) or buying from sellers of low reputation (experiment 4). The effect of surcharge levied by sellers of low reputation is weakened for consumers with low (vs high) shipping‐charge skepticism (experiment 5). Practical implications This study is helpful to online sellers if they can identify their reputation, product category and those consumers who have shipping‐charge skepticism, they can create extra profit through surcharge practice. Originality/value The authors’ investigation extends the literature on consumers’ price processing by identifying the important moderators (seller reputation, product category, and elaboration) and probing into the decision process (via the response time). The results suggest prescriptive strategies for online sellers
Advertising · Antecedent (behavioral psychology · Business · E-commerce · Economics · Microeconomics · Product (mathematics · Profit (economics · Purchasing · Reputation · Skepticism · Auction Theory and Applications · Computer Science · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Psychology · Social Psychology · Spam and Phishing Detection · Marketing
Intimate knowledge initiators
Understanding the influence of professional status and service feedback on patients' doctor choice in online healthcare markets
Understanding group-buying websites continuance
Online product category and pricing strategies of land-based retailers
Theorizing the textual differences between authentic and fictitious reviews
The privacy dyad
How customers’ offline experience affects the adoption of online banking
The impact of informational antecedents on Generation Z consumers’ evaluations of cross-border e-commerce transaction costs and purchase decisions
Advertising Message Strategy in Television Commercials
Building Theory about Theory Building
Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets
Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations
Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations
Reputation systems
An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Placebo Effects of Marketing Actions
The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site
Information and Consumer Behavior
Job Market Signaling
When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated
Surcharges and Seller Reputation
| Citations per year | 0.82 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Highly cited | No |