Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Common‐ and multi‐offset ground‐penetrating radar study of a Roman villa, Tourega, Portugal

Bibliographic Data

ID12429765
AuthorsBrooke A Berard (University of Calgary), J M Maillol (ARC Resources (Canada), corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume15
Issue1
Pages32-46
Publication date2007-12-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchaeological Prospection (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1075-2196 • E-ISSN: 1099-0763
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/arp.319
OpenAlexW2043153484
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited14

A ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) survey was conducted at the site of the first to fourth century AD Roman villa of Tourega, near Évora, Alentejo region, Portugal. This site has been partially excavated, revealing a bathhouse complex consisting of a tank reservoir, multiple bathing rooms and a major corridor. The excavated portion of Tourega provides direct archaeological feedback as to the size, shape, depth and orientation of structures revealed by GPR surveys. A 4500 m 2 area surrounding the known site was surveyed using common‐offset 500 MHz and 200 MHz pseudo‐three‐dimensional acquisition. Amplitude time‐slice analysis reveals a large number of well‐defined additional structures confirming a much broader extension of the site. For shallow buried rectilinear structural targets, the high frequency 500 MHz common‐offset data provide excellent imaging. However, limited depth penetration at 500 MHz necessitated a lower frequency of investigation; therefore 200 MHz common‐ offset and multi‐offset data were also acquired. Two 200 MHz multi‐offset GPR profiles were obtained over the large double‐walled structure identified on the time‐slices, acquired using a newly proposed multi‐offset acquisition technique – rapid multi‐offset acquisition. This acquisition technique uses the existing single‐channel GPR system, is extremely cost‐effective, and easily acquires a high fold. Rapid multi‐offset acquisition provides an average time saving up to five times that of stationary multi‐offset profiling. The 200 MHz multi‐offset profiles provide a greater depth penetration and enhanced structural detail (i.e. improved imaging of dipping structures) than comparable 200 MHz common‐offset profiles. Post‐stack, inverse‐Q filtering increases vertical resolution and interpretability of the multi‐offset sections via removal of wavelet dispersion. Although multi‐offset data are less feasible for characterizing this site in three dimensions because of the large time commitment in data collection, two multi‐offset profiles over key structures of interest improved the final site interpretation, with enhanced image quality and higher resolution than comparable common‐offset profiles. The combined results of the multi‐offset survey with a common‐offset grid should encourage a more frequent use of multi‐offset data at archaeological sites when the depth extent of the archaeological site is uncertain. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Ground-Penetrating Radar · Offset (computer science · Radar · Remote sensing · Telecommunications · Computer Science · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis · Seismic Waves and Analysis · Geology

  • Detecting Trends in the Prediction of the Buried Past

    Open Access•Chris Gaffney•Archaeometry•2008

  • Multi‐offset ground penetrating radar methods to image buried foundations of a medieval town wall, Great Yarmouth, UK

    Open Access•Adam Booth, Adam D Booth et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2010

  • Large‐area high‐resolution ground‐penetrating radar measurements for archaeological prospection

    Open Access•Immo Trinks, Alois Hinterleitner et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2018

  • Three‐dimensional, multi‐offset ground‐penetrating radar imaging of archaeological targets

    Open Access•Adam Booth, Adam D Booth et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2008

  • The STREAM X Multichannel GPR System

    Open Access•Alexandre Novo, Michel Dabas et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2012

  • Comparison of a stepped‐frequency continuous wave and a pulsed GPR system

    Open Access•Jürg Leckebusch•Archaeological Prospection•2011

  • Ground‐penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography studies in the biblical Pisidian Antioch city, southwest Anatolia

    Open Access•Çağlayan Balkaya, Ü Yalçın Kalyoncuoğlu et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2018

  • Integrated Geophysical and Archaeological Investigations of Aquinum in Frosinone, Italy

    Open Access•Salvatore Piro, Giuseppe Ceraudo et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2011

  • Ground‐penetrating Radar for High‐resolution Mapping of Soil and Rock Stratigraphy 1

    Open Access•J L Davis, Joel Davis et al.•Geophysical Prospecting•1989

  • Ground penetrating radar study of iron age tombs in Southeastern Kazakhstan

    Open Access•M Pipan, Luca Baradello et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2001

  • Georadar in the Roman civil town Carnuntum, Austria

    Open Access•Wolfgang Neubauer, Alois Hinterleitner et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2002

  • Recent Archaeological Work in Roman Iberia (1990–2002)

    Open Access•Simon Keay•The Journal of Roman Studies•2003

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0.44
Citation span2008 - 2018 (11)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae