Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Improving Climate Change Acceptance Among U.S. Conservatives Through Value-Based Message Targeting

Bibliographic Data

ID12431353
AuthorsGraham Dixon (0000-0001-7810-940X, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, corresponding author), Jay Hmielowski (Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA), Jay D Hmielowski (0000-0001-6449-4714, Washington State University), Yanni Ma (0000-0003-2144-4076, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA)
Year2017
Volume39
Issue4
Pages520-534
Publication date2017-06-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Communication (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1075-5470 • E-ISSN: 1552-8545
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1075547017715473
OpenAlexW2655469294
LanguageEN
Citations received65
References cited20

Although prior research has identified communication strategies for reducing climate change skepticism, recent research suggests such approaches can backfire. To explore this issue, we report on a preliminary study investigating two prominent messaging styles: consensus and targeted messages. While consensus messaging did not produce significant effects, targeted messages emphasizing free market solutions to climate change were effective at improving conservatives’ climate change acceptance. Furthermore, the inclusion of consensus information did not improve or diminish the effects of the targeted messages. These findings underscore the utility of targeted messaging in improving climate change acceptance among political conservatives

Climate change · Global warming · Inclusion (mineral · Political science · Public relations · Regulatory focus theory · Scientific consensus · Skepticism · Value (mathematics · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Media Influence and Health · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Framing Climate Change

    Open Access•Dominik A Stecuła, Eric Merkley•Frontiers in Communication•2019

  • The gateway belief model

    Open Access•Sander Van Der Linden, Anthony Leiserowitz et al.•Journal of Environmental Psychology•2019

  • Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It

    Open Access•Lewandowsky•Annual Review of Public Health•2021

  • Some Deficits and Some Misperceptions

    Open Access•Sedona Chinn, Josh Pasek•International Journal of Public…•2020

  • Facing the pandemic with trust in science

    Open Access•Justin Sulik, Ophelia Deroy et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2021

  • Exploring Undergraduate Biology Students’ Science Communication About Covid-19

    Open Access•Brock Couch, Elizabeth Wybren et al.•Frontiers in Education•2022

  • Le populisme climatique de Donald J. Trump et le libre marché des idées

    Open Access•Jean-Daniel Collomb•Transatlantica•2021

  • Social Psychological Perspectives on Political Polarization

    Open Access•Jennifer C Cole, Ash Gillis et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2025

  • A motivational systems approach to investigating opinions on climate change

    Daniel C Molden, Robin Bayes et al.•Thinking & Reasoning•2022

  • Information about the human causes of global warming influences causal attribution, concern, and policy support related to global warming

    Parrish Bergquist, Jennifer R Marlon et al.•Thinking & Reasoning•2022

  • “Misinformation is Layered, Multifaceted … and Attached to Access and Power”

    Open Access•Lillie D Williamson, Hannah Monroe et al.•Health Communication•2026

  • Improving African Americans’ Intentions to Enroll in a Health Registry

    Aurora Occa, Diane B Francis et al.•Health Communication•2023

  • The Role of Deliberative Cognitive Styles in Preventing Belief in Politicized Covid-19 Misinformation

    Stella Lee, Chul‐joo Lee et al.•Health Communication•2023

  • Persuasive ethical appeals and climate messaging

    Victoria DePalma•Philosophical Psychology•2024

  • How Scientists Perceive NOS and Its Value for Science Communication

    Open Access•Sarah Poor, Benjamin C Herman et al.•Science & Education•2025

  • Addressing public opinion misperceptions of racial disparities in the criminal justice system

    Graham Dixon, Lanier Frush Holt•Communication Research Reports•2025

  • Sliding Doors

    Open Access•Lynne Zummo, Benjamin Janney et al.•Science Education•2026

  • It's not just a science thing

    Open Access•Benjamin C Herman, Sarah Poor et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2024

  • Communicating the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change

    Open Access•Matthew H Goldberg, Abel Gustafson et al.•Environment and Behavior•2022

  • Improving GM Consensus Acceptance Through Reduced Reactance and Climate Change-based Message Targeting

    A Hasell, Benjamin Lyons et al.•Environmental Communication•2020

  • Exposure to Scientific Consensus Does Not Cause Psychological Reactance

    Sander Van Der Linden, Edward Maibach et al.•Environmental Communication•2023

  • A Research Agenda for Climate Change Communication and Public Opinion

    Robin Bayes, Toby Bolsen et al.•Environmental Communication•2023

  • How Do Climate Change Skeptics Engage with Opposing Views Online? Evidence from a Major Climate Change Skeptic Forum on Reddit

    Laura Oswald, J Bright•Environmental Communication•2022

  • Countering Identity-protective Responses to Climate Change Data

    Heather Akin, Bruce W Hardy et al.•Environmental Communication•2020

  • The Power of Moral Words in Politicized Climate Change Communication

    Jiyoun Kim, Saymin Lee et al.•Environmental Communication•2023

  • Unintended Effects of Emphasizing the Role of Climate Change in Recent Natural Disasters

    Graham Dixon, Olivia M Bullock et al.•Environmental Communication•2019

  • Are You Threatening Me? Identity Threat, Resistance to Persuasion, and Boomerang Effects in Environmental Communication

    Yanni Ma, Jay D Hmielowski•Environmental Communication•2022

  • More Evidence of Psychological Reactance to Consensus Messaging

    Graham Dixon, Jay Hmielowski et al.•Environmental Communication•2023

  • Psychological Reactance From Reading Basic Facts on Climate Change

    Yanni Ma, Graham Dixon et al.•Environmental Communication•2019

  • Associations of locus of control, information processing style and anti-reflexivity with climate change scepticism in an Australian sample

    Open Access•Breanna C Fraser, Rachael Sharman et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2023

  • Counteracting climate denial

    Open Access•Laila Mendy, Mikael Karlsson et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2024

  • Creative (Climate) Communications

    Open Access•Maxwell Boykoff•Creative Communications•2019

  • Majority rules

    Open Access•Hugo Mercier, Olivier Morin•Evolutionary Human Sciences•2019

  • Developing leaders to tackle wicked problems at the nexus of food, energy, and water systems

    Open Access•Alisa A Wade, Amina Grant et al.•Elementa Science of the…•2020

  • Incorporating moral foundations into persuasive conversations

    Open Access•Jiyoun Kim, Yuan Wang et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2026

  • Neutralizing the Effect of Political Worldviews by Communicating Scientific Agreement

    Open Access•Graham Dixon, Austin Hubner et al.•Science Communication•2018

  • Correcting Misinformation About Neuroscience via Social Media

    Open Access•Ciarra N Smith, Holli H Seitz•Science Communication•2019

  • Promoting Persuasion With Ideologically Tailored Science Messages

    Open Access•Kate T Luong, R Kelly Garrett et al.•Science Communication•2019

  • The Influence of Flooding Imagery and Party Cues on Perceived Threat, Collective Efficacy, and Intentions for Political Action to Address Climate Change

    Open Access•P Sol Hart, Lauren Feldman et al.•Science Communication•2023

  • The Impact of Message Source on the Effectiveness of Communications About Climate Change

    Open Access•Toby Bolsen, Risa Palm et al.•Science Communication•2019

  • Using a News Article to Convey Climate Science Consensus Information

    Open Access•Jacob B Rode, Saad Iqbal et al.•Science Communication•2021

  • Party Elites or Manufactured Doubt? The Informational Context of Climate Change Polarization

    Open Access•Eric Merkley, Dominik A Stecuła•Science Communication•2018

  • The Effects of Establishing Intimacy and Consubstantiality on Group Discussions About Climate Change Solutions

    Open Access•Emma Frances Bloomfield, Lyn M Van Swol et al.•Science Communication•2020

  • Fostering Hope

    Benjamin Janney, Lynne Zummo et al.•Visitor Studies•2025

  • The Role of Construal Level in Message Effects Research

    Open Access•Stella Lee•Communication Theory•2019

  • Manipulating Environmental Commitment

    Open Access•Eric D Wesselmann, Shane W Boyd et al.•Psychological Reports•2021

  • Factual belief polarization between Democrats and Republicans

    Open Access•Roderik Rekker•Frontiers in Political Science•2024

  • Intersecting identities

    Open Access•Ying Miao•Environmental Sociology•2026

  • Convincing conservatives

    Open Access•Ash Gillis, Michael P Vandenbergh et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Moral hazard or not? The effects of learning about carbon dioxide removal on perceptions of climate mitigation in the United States

    Open Access•P Sol Hart, Victoria Campbell-Árvai et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • Do they really mean it? What the conservative climate caucus is for and against

    Open Access•Jean-Daniel Collomb•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  • Consensus, convergence, and Covid-19

    Open Access•Marilie Coetsee•Leadership•2022

  • When Online Comments Weigh In

    Yanni Ma, Xuerong Lu et al.•Mass Communication & Society•2026

  • What drives support for self-driving car technology in the United States

    Graham Dixon, P Sol Hart et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2018

  • Trusting scientific experts in an online world

    Open Access•Kimberly Boyd•Synthese•2022

  • Public scientific testimony in the scientific image

    Open Access•Mikkel Gerken•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2020

  • Scientific values and value-based science reporting

    Open Access•Mikkel Gerken•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • Psychological Distance to Science Affects Science Evaluations

    Open Access•Bojana Većkalov, Natalia Zarzeczna et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2025

  • Negacionismo y errores cognitivos? El origen social de las preferencias

    Open Access•Ernesto Ganuza, Alfredo Ramos•Revista Española de Investigaciones…•2026

  • Correcting Misperceptions about the MMR Vaccine

    Open Access•Kristin Lunz-Trujillo, Matthew Motta et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Party Cues in the News

    Open Access•Eric Merkley, Dominik A Stecuła•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Transforming Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine to Address the Climate Crisis

    Open Access•Elissa S Epel, Kristi E White et al.•Annals of Behavioral Medicine•2025

  • Effective advocacy

    Nicolas M Anspach, Gorana Draguljić•Environmental Politics•2019

  • Appealing to Independents

    Beatrice Magistro, R Michael Alvarez•Environmental Politics•2024

  • A toolkit for understanding and addressing climate scepticism

    Open Access•Matthew J Hornsey, Lewandowsky•Nature Human Behaviour•2022

  • The Rationalizing Voter

    Open Access•Milton Lodge, Charles S Taber•Rationalizing Voter•2013

  • Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression

    Open Access•Andrew F Hayes, Li Cai•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  • Free-Market Ideology and Environmental Degradation

    Open Access•Yuko Heath, Robert Gifford•Environment and Behavior•2006

  • Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers

    Open Access•Paul G Bain, Matthew J Hornsey et al.•Nature Climate Change•2012

  • The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science

    Open Access•Lewandowsky, Stephan Lewandowsky et al.•Nature Climate Change•2012

  • Rational Irrationality

    Open Access•John Cook, Lewandowsky•Topics in Cognitive Science•2016

  • Boomerang Effects in Science Communication

    Open Access•P Sol Hart, Erik C Nisbet•Communication Research•2011

  • The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes

    Open Access•Matthew Feinberg, R Willer•Psychological Science•2012

  • Defeating Kyoto

    Aaron M Mccright, Riley E Dunlap•Social Problems•2003

  • Communicating Climate Change

    Matthew C Nisbet•Environment Science and Policy…•2009

  • Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-Probability Samples

    David S Yeager, Jon A Krosnick et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Brian F Schaffner et al.•Political Analysis•2014

  • Solution aversion

    Troy Campbell, Troy H Campbell et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2014

  • Boomerangs versus Javelins

    Jack Zhou•Environmental Politics•2016

  • The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001-2010

    Open Access•Aaron M Mccright, Riley E Dunlap•Sociological Quarterly•2011

Unique citing works65
Citations per year8,13
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 65

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae