Do structured risk assessments predict violent, any, and sexual offending better than unstructured judgment? An umbrella review

Although it is widely believed that risk assessment tools lead to more accurate estimates of risk of violence and offending than unstructured clinical judgments, the nature and quality of evidence that supports this view is unclear. As such, we conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews. Through a search of 15 databases, we identified nine systematic reviews, including six meta-analyses and three narrative systematic reviews, that compared unstructured and structured risk judgments for any, violent, and sexual offending. Each review was independently coded by two raters. Raters also coded the 46 primary studies on unstructured judgment included in these reviews. Although the reviews concluded that structured risk judgments are superior to unstructured judgments, the data supporting these conclusions have limitations. None of the systematic reviews directly compared risk assessment tools with unstructured judgments. In addition, two thirds of the primary studies included in the systematic reviews were from the 1980s or earlier, and 89% had serious methodological limitations that created a high risk of bias. In many cases, the primary studies did not examine unstructured judgments per se but instead used proxies such as legal and administrative decisions. As such, there is a pressing need for an updated systematic review that focuses on direct comparison studies and carefully addresses study limitations. To address this gap, we have initiated a preregistered systematic review

Criminology · Medical emergency · Poison control · Sexual assault · Clinical Psychology · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Medicine · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

• Risk Perception and Risk Communication

  Open Access•Ashley E Rodríguez, Evan Marie Lowder et al.•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2025

  Incluir item

• Clinical Override Use With the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory

  Open Access•Fred Schmidt, Amy Killen et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2024

  Incluir item

• Pretrial Decision-Making Matrices

  Open Access•Evan Marie Lowder, Zainab Bakarr Kamara et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2023

  Incluir item

• Resistance to Antisocial Peers in Adolescents Found Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder

  Open Access•Nicol Patricny, Andrew M Haag et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2022

  Incluir item

• Male Perpetrators of Child Sexual Abuse

  Open Access•Marta Sousa, Olga Cunha et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2025

  Incluir item

• Sensible Pretrial Reform

  Open Access•Ryan M Labrecque, Matthew Demichele et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2026

  Incluir item

• Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Management

  Open Access•Antonia Sorge, Giovanni Borrelli et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  Incluir item

• Research-based Risk Factors for Child Maltreatment

  Open Access•Brenda Erens, Corine De Ruiter et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2022

  Incluir item