Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Racially gerrymandering the content of police tests to satisfy the U.S. Justice Department

A case study

Bibliographic Data

ID12434836
AuthorsLinda S Gottfredson (0000-0003-2255-7646, corresponding author)
Year1996
Volume2
Issue3-4
Pages418-446
Publication date1996-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychology Public Policy and Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1076-8971 • E-ISSN: 1939-1528
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/1076-8971.2.3-4.418
OpenAlexW2063327143
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited10

both falsely assume that all racial-ethnic groups would pass job-related, unbiased employment tests at the same rate. Unreasonable law and enforcement create pressure for personnel psychologists to violate professional principles and lower the merit relatedness of tests in the service of race-based goals. This article illustrates such a case by describing how the content of a police entrance examination in Nassau County, New York, was stripped of crucial cognitive demands to change the racial composition of the applicants who seemed most qualified. The test was thereby rendered nearly worthless for actually making such determinations. The article concludes by examining the implications of the case for policing in Nassau County, Congressional oversight of Justice Department activities, and psychology's role in helping its members to avoid such coercion. The influence of politics and government on science has long been a concern in both science and society. I focus here on one aspect of that influence as it relates to psychology. What are the responsibilities of psychologists when federal law or its enforcement agencies press them to implement scientific theories that have

Coercion (linguistics · Criminal justice · Criminology · Economic Justice · Empirical research · Enforcement · Ethnic group · Law enforcement · Police department · Political science · Race (biology · Sociology · Test (biology · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Law · Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation · Psychological Testing and Assessment · Psychology

  • Intelligence and job performance

    J E Hunter, Frank L Schmidt•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1996

  • Affirmative action

    Faye J Crosby, Aarti Iyer et al.•American Psychologist•2003

  • Assessing Affirmative Action

    Harry Holzer, David Neumark et al.•Journal of Economic Literature•2000

  • Consequences of how we define and assess intelligence

    W M Williams•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1996

  • An evaluation of the written selection test

    Open Access•Larry K Gaines, Steven Falkenberg et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•1998

  • Doing, Redoing, and Undoing Gender

    Open Access•Merry Morash, Robin N Haarr•Feminist Criminology•2011

  • Skills gaps, not tests, make racial proportionality impossible

    Linda S Gottfredson•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000

  • Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities.

    Leaetta M Hough, Newell K Eaton et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•1990

  • Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection

    Deniz S Ones, Chockalingam Viswesvaran et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•1996

  • Why g matters

    Open Access•Linda S Gottfredson•intelligence•1997

  • Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing

    Paul R Sackett, Steffanie L Wilk•American Psychologist•1994

  • The science and politics of race-norming

    Linda S Gottfredson•American Psychologist•1994

  • Seven Criterion-Related Validity Studies Conducted with the National Police Officer Selection Test

    Open Access•Fred M Rafilson, Fred Rafilson et al.•Psychological Reports•1996

  • Intelligence and public policy

    Nathan Brody•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1996

  • Intelligence and job performance

    J E Hunter, Frank L Schmidt•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1996

  • Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance

    J E Hunter, Ronda F Hunter•Psychological Bulletin•1984

  • A Monte Carlo evaluation of three formula estimates of cross-validated multiple correlation

    Neal Schmitt, Bryan W Coyle et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1977

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,23
Citation span1996 - 2011 (16)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae