Crossmodal response precueing
Age-related differences in action preparation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12443053 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ludivine A P Schils (0009-0006-4605-8066, RWTH Aachen University), Iring Koch (0000-0001-9664-8220, RWTH Aachen University), Pi‐Chun Huang (0000-0001-6872-6615, National Cheng Kung University), Shulan Hsieh (0000-0001-6247-244X, National Cheng Kung University), Jos J Adam (0000-0001-7999-4033, Maastricht University), Denise N Stephan (0000-0001-6390-3985, RWTH Aachen University) |
| Editors | Brittany S Cassidy (0000-0002-1449-0886) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journals of Gerontology Series B (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1079-5014 • E-ISSN: 1758-5368 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/geronb/gbaf160 |
| PMID | 40880304 |
| OpenAlex | W4413817246 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 39 |
Objectives This study examined the impact of crossmodal response precueing on action preparation in young and older adults. Methods Young (n = 37; 18–30 years) and older (n = 36; 60–77 years) adults performed a crossmodal visual-auditory version of the precueing paradigm, using a 4-choice task with 3 precue types. Informative precues either referred to response modality (manual vs vocal) or abstract spatial response feature (left vs right key press or vocal response). Informative precues reduced the number of possible stimulus-response options from 4 to 2, whereas uninformative precues cued all 4 possible options. The precueing benefit was calculated as the performance difference between informative versus uninformative precues. In addition, the cue-target interval (CTI) was varied to examine the benefit of long preparation time. Results Response-modality precues led to better performance compared to spatial and uninformative precues. In response-modality precues, older adults benefited more from long preparation time than young adults. For older adults, spatial precues produced a speed-accuracy tradeoff relative to uninformative cues, with shorter response times but higher error rates, particularly when the CTI was long. Discussion The pronounced increase in error rates with spatial precues when the CTI was long suggests that older adults had particular difficulty maintaining an abstract spatial response code without being able to specify the effector modality. Overall, the findings suggest that, in a complex multimodal setting involving variability in both stimulus modality and response modality, young and older adults are efficient when they are cued for a specific response modality
Audiology · Cognitive psychology · Crossmodal · Cued speech · Modality (human–computer interaction · Perception · Physical medicine and rehabilitation · Stimulus (psychology · Visual perception · Computer Science · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Medicine · Multisensory perception and integration · Neuroscience · Psychology
The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.
The Simon effect as tool and heuristic
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1
Proactive motor control within and between hands
The role of sensory modality in age-related distraction
Spared Within-Hands but Impaired Between-Hands Response Preparation in Aging
The role of age, working memory, and response inhibition in deviance distraction
Transformations for within-subject designs
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |