Economic Class and Redistribution of Income Through Spousal Benefits Under Social Security
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12455036 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Martha N Ozawa (corresponding author), Baeg-Eui Hong, Baegeui Hong |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Publication date | 2001-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Poverty (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1087-5549 • E-ISSN: 1540-7608 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1300/j134v05n03_01 |
| OpenAlex | W1988102644 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 6 |
As the public debates Social Security reform, the provision of spousal benefits will become an important issue. Under the Social Security program, the spouse with lower lifetime earnings is guaranteed at least 50 percent of the benefit of the spouse with higher lifetime earnings. Given the increasing financial problems of the Social Security program, spousal benefits will be scrutinized as a cost-cutting measure. Who benefits from the provision of spousal benefits, and how much? Is there a difference between the spousal benefits that lower-income and higher-income married couples receive? This article presents findings from an empirical study that investigated these questions and discusses their policy implications
Demographic economics · Earnings · Economic growth · Economics · Labour economics · Political science · Public economics · Quality (philosophy · Redistribution (election · Redistribution of income and wealth · Social benefits · Social security · Sociology · Spouse · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Finance
Marital status and change in income status 10 years after retirement
Income Maintenance and Work Incentives
The 1983 Amendments to the Social Security Act
Individual Equity versus Social Adequacy in Federal Old-Age Insurance
An Analysis of HEW's Proposals on Social Security
The Formative Years of Social Security
| Citations per year | 0.18 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2019 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |