Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Archipelago Approach To Mixed Method Evaluation

Bibliographic Data

ID12471400
AuthorsFrances Lawrenz (0000-0002-6317-7992, University of Minnesota, corresponding author), Douglas Huffman (0000-0001-8158-8448)
Year2002
Volume23
Issue3
Pages331-338
Publication date2002-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/109821400202300308
OpenAlexW4243920641
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited6

In this article, we propose a new metaphorical framework for understanding and using mixed methods evaluation. Our re-conceptualization of mixing methods provides important insights into the theoretical and practical challenges of using a mixed method approach. Mixed methods can create philosophical and practical dilemmas in the ways data are collected, analyzed, interpreted and reported. We used an archipelago as a metaphor for resolving these challenges. An archipelago is a set of islands that loosely forms a group. Using the archipelago as a metaphor helped to clarify and re-conceptualize the evaluation approach and its findings by allowing simultaneous consideration of different mixed methods and stances. The results have implications for those attempting to use mixed methods to evaluate programs

Archaeology · Archipelago · Conceptualization · Epistemology · Geography · Linguistics · Management science · Metaphor · Multimethodology · Set (abstract data type · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Delphi Technique in Research · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science · Artificial Intelligence

  • Time to participate

    Elaine Huber, M Harvey•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2013

  • A new perspective for mixed-methods evaluations

    Open Access•Shaban Elahi, Nadia Kalantari et al.•Evaluation Journal of Australasia•2015

  • Using Multi-Site Core Evaluation to Provide “Scientific” Evidence

    Frances Lawrenz, Douglas Huffman•Canadian Journal of Program…•2004

  • Evaluative Site Visits

    Open Access•Frances Lawrenz, Nanette Keiser et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2003

  • Mosaics, Triangles, and DNA

    Open Access•Pat Bazeley, Lynn Kemp•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2011

  • Integration and Publications as Indicators of "Yield" From Mixed Methods Studies

    Open Access•Alicia O’cathain, Elizabeth Murphy et al.•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2007

  • Perspectives in Maritime Archaeology’

    Open Access•Marko Marila, Kristin Ilves•Public Archaeology•2022

  • Measuring the effectiveness of mental health courts

    Nathan Wolff, Nancy Wolff et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2005

  • Qualitative evaluation and research methods

    Open Access•David Ellis•International Journal of…•1990

  • Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed‐method evaluation

    Open Access•Jennifer C Greene, Valerie J Caracelli•New Directions for Evaluation•1997

  • Utilization-focused evaluation

    Open Access•Lynn Westbrook•Library & Information Science…•1998

Citations per year0.35
Citation span2003 - 2022 (20)
Highly citedNo
Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae