Cheating, lying, and trying in recreational sports and leisure practices
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12494203 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pam R Sailors (Missouri State University, corresponding author), Sarah Teetzel (0000-0002-4991-1513, University of Manitoba), Charlene Weaving (Human Kinetics Department, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canada) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 563-577 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-29 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Annals of Leisure Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1174-5398 • E-ISSN: 2159-6816 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/11745398.2017.1284009 |
| OpenAlex | W2581948832 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 24 |
This paper analyses the ethics of rule breaking, lying, and failing to try one’s best in recreational sports and leisure activities. Foundational philosophical arguments regarding the ethics of cheating, lying, and failing to try by Scott Kretchmar, Robert Simon, and Sissela Bok are applied to cases of seemingly unethical behaviour in leisure practices. Three specific scenarios are addressed: (1) recreational-level participants who intentionally break rules, (2) participants who exaggerate their performances, and (3) participants who appear more concerned with collecting medals and ensuring selfies are taken than with putting forth significant effort. The resulting philosophical analysis addresses why cheating, lying, and sandbagging can be tolerated as part of the ethos of some leisure activities while being disdained in others, and what, if anything, is morally wrong about cheating, lying and not trying one’s best during recreational sports and leisure practices
Advertising · Business · Cheating · Lying · Political science · Public relations · Recreation · Sociology · Doping in Sports · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Sport Psychology and Performance · Sports Analytics and Performance
| Highly cited | No |
|---|