Doctrinal Dispute within Interdenominational Missions
The Shanghai Tract Committee in the 1840s
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12555398 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John T P Lai (0000-0003-2520-7078, Chinese University of Hong Kong, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 307-317 |
| Publication date | 2010-06-04 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1356-1863 • E-ISSN: 1474-0591 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1356186310000052 |
| OpenAlex | W2067177404 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
Both interdenominational co-operation and denominational competition featured in the Protestant missionary literary enterprise in nineteenth-century China. The interdenominational Religious Tract Society in London became the most vital link between the missionary translators, printing presses and target audiences in the production, publication and distribution of Christian tracts. Ideally, interdenominational missions would pool resources and promote cooperation among missionaries with different denominational affiliations. Doctrinal disputes, however, seem to have been inevitable among them in the everyday operation of missions. The first tract committee established in China, the Shanghai Tract Committee in the 1840s is a case in point. Unequal denominational representation resulted in heated doctrinal controversies and the resignation of a Committee member over the publication of a problematic tract in Chinese
China · Political science · Politics · Protestantism · Representation (politics · Chinese history and philosophy · History · Law · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Highly cited | No |
|---|