Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The equal opportunity harasser, sexual harassment, gender-neutral words, and Ludwig Wittgenstein

Bibliographic Data

ID12573451
AuthorsRichard L Pate (0000-0003-3802-5695, Sacred Heart University, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume17
Issue3
Pages180-194
Publication date2017-07-25
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Discrimination and the Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1358-2291 • E-ISSN: 2047-9468
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1358229117722269
OpenAlexW2738345738
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited10

The equal opportunity harasser (EOH) in sex discrimination cases is an employer who harasses both male and female employees alike. The EOH principle postulates that equal harassment of both genders equates to an absence of disparate treatment and therefore an absence of the discriminatory conduct necessary to violate antidiscrimination laws. In comparing the equality of the harassment, courts have generally focused on external indicators consisting mainly of perceptible manifestations of the harassment, such as the number of harassing episodes, the nature of the harassment, and most, notably, the words used during such episodes. This note’s focus is on the words used during the harassment. Its premise maintains that the external indicators analysis fails to consider implicit indicators, that is, the societal hierarchy and norms which shape the persons’ sentiments long before the employer employee relationship is formed. It is this less palpable background which lends meaning to the words used during the harassment. This note suggests that the most viable standard should hold the presumption that even apparently gender-neutral words are virtually inexorably due to sex, accordingly, the equal EOH should be per se rejected

Equal opportunity · Harassment · Law and economics · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Political science · Premise · Presumption · Sexual discrimination · Sociology · Gender Studies · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Philosophy · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies · Social Psychology

  • Muslim women in the workplace and the Equality Act 2010

    Open Access•Catríona Cannon•International Journal of…•2023

  • Aversive Racism and Selection Decisions

    Open Access•John F Dovidio, Samuel L Gaertner•Psychological Science•2000

  • Why can't we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust

    John F Dovidio, Samuel E Gaertner et al.•Cultural Diversity & Ethnic…•2002

  • What's Wrong with Sexual Harassment

    Katherine M Franke•Stanford Law Review•1997

  • On the Nature of Contemporary Prejudice

    Open Access•John F Dovidio•Journal of Social Issues•2001

  • Philosophical investigations

    Ludwig Wittgenstein•Philosophical investigations•1974

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo
Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae