Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Generalisations, causal relationships and moral responsibility

Bibliographic Data

ID12595641
AuthorsFederico Picinali (0000-0001-5085-9700, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume20
Issue2
Pages121-135
Publication date2016-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe International Journal of Evidence & Proof (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1365-7127 • E-ISSN: 1740-5572
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1365712716628539
OpenAlexW2306332250
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited4

In Chapter 4 of his book Character in the Criminal Trial, Mike Redmayne addresses a series of non-epistemic arguments against the use of bad character evidence. Redmayne is particularly successful in debunking arguments focusing on the defendant’s autonomy. Inspired by the early drafts of Chapter 4—which I had the honour to read—I published an article trying to contribute to the debate. At the time of writing, however, I was not aware of a beguiling argument concerning the use of behavioural generalisations, formulated and defended by Amit Pundik in a recent research paper. According to this argument, we should not prove guilt using generalisations that presuppose a causal relationship between an antecedent factor and individual behaviour, if this relationship negates the freedom of the individual under any theory about determinism and free will that one may adopt—be it a libertarian or a compatibilist theory. In this article I critically assess this argument and attempt to show that it does not succeed

Antecedent (behavioral psychology · Argument (complex analysis · Autonomy · Character (mathematics · Compatibilism · Determinism · Epistemology · Free will · Honour · Incompatibilism · Moral responsibility · Political science · Sociology · Free Will and Agency · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • The probable and the nonarbitrary

    Open Access•Liat Levanon•Legal Studies•2021

  • Against racial profiling

    Amit Pundik•University of Toronto Law Journal•2017

  • A missing piece in the debate about naked statistical evidence

    Open Access•Alejo Joaquín Giles•The International Journal of…•2023

  • Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person

    Harry G Frankfurt•The Journal of Philosophy•1971

  • Character in the Criminal Trial

    Mike Redmayne•Character in the Criminal Trial•2015

  • The incompatibility of free will and determinism

    Open Access•Peter Van Inwagen•Philosophical Studies•1975

  • Recent Work on Free Will and Moral Responsibility

    Open Access•N Levy, Michael Mckenna•Philosophy Compass•2009

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2017 - 2023 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae