Revisiting the primary bias
The role of innumeracy in the misperception of prevalence of chronic illnesses
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12598299 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jocelyn Raude (0000-0001-8020-4975, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, EHESP French School of Public Health, Rennes, France, corresponding author), Christina Xiao (0000-0002-1183-0259, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, EHESP French School of Public Health, Rennes, France), Pascal Crépey (0000-0003-1852-0752, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, EHESP French School of Public Health, Rennes, France) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 64-82 |
| Publication date | 2022-05-23 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Risk Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1366-9877 • E-ISSN: 1466-4461 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13669877.2022.2077415 |
| OpenAlex | W4281297517 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 51 |
Although people have been repeatedly found to underestimate frequencies of common illnesses and overestimate those of rare illnesses, not much is known about this consistent bias in risk perception, termed “primary bias” in the literature, as well as the origin of its variations among different subpopulations. To fill this gap, we conducted a national survey among a representative sample of the French population (n = 3,245) to compare the perceived and actual prevalence of chronic illnesses, and to test the hypothesis that numeracy may play an important role in the accuracy of judgments of risk frequencies. The participants were asked to complete a 10-items numeracy scale and to estimate the prevalence of a variety of social conditions and chronic illnesses such as cancers or heart diseases by using a percentage scale. The analyses show that (1) participants tend to greatly overestimate the prevalence of conditions affecting small percentages of people, and underestimate those affecting a large percentage of them, (2) the Tversky and Kahneman’s probability weighting function provides an adequate model to represent the discrepancy between the perceived and actual prevalence of these illnesses or occupations, and (3) the magnitude of the primary bias varies principally as a function of the respondents’ numeracy. These results suggest that the primary bias that affects perceptions of prevalence of chronic diseases is not fundamentally different from those characterizing other types of probabilistic judgments. They also confirm that numeracy plays a considerable role in people’s ability to transform epidemiological observations from their social environment into more accurate estimates
Environmental health · Literacy · Numeracy · Population · Sample (material · Weighting · Demography · Health disparities and outcomes · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Medicine · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management · Epidemiology
Thinking and Deciding
The Probability Weighting Function
Culture and Identity‐Protective Cognition
The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography
The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics
Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function
The affect heuristic
Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined
General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples
Advances in prospect theory
Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models
On the psychology of prediction.
Risk Analysis and Human Behavior
Gender, race, and perceived risk
Are People Optimistically Biased about the Risk of Covid-19 Infection? Lessons from the First Wave of the Pandemic in Europe
Are trivial risks the greatest risks of all
Scientist and public responses to BSE‐related risk
Risk perceptions of Covid-19 around the world
Feeling the Numbers
Do Smokers Underestimate Risks
Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk
How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear
Replicating patterns of prospect theory for decision under risk
How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making
| Highly cited | No |
|---|