Lost in translation
Inadequate non-technical risk assessment within major project teams in mining
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12598300 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jocelyn Fraser (0000-0002-7664-4553, University of British Columbia, corresponding author), Lívia Méllo (Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada), L M R de Mello (University of British Columbia), Nadja C Kunz (0000-0001-7710-106X, University of British Columbia) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 711-724 |
| Publication date | 2023-05-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Risk Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1366-9877 • E-ISSN: 1466-4461 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13669877.2023.2208121 |
| OpenAlex | W4375856756 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 29 |
Infrastructure projects increasingly encounter delays due to non-technical risks (NTR), those risks arising from interactions between business and external stakeholders with the potential to create future negative impacts on society and the environment. One sector where NTR is having a significant adverse impact is the global mining sector, where industry leaders rank NTRs as the leading cause of business risk. We investigate how NTRs are assessed during project pre-feasibility using semi-structured interviews with 20 respondents from major mining companies. We find four main factors contribute to the problem of NTR assessment: there is lack of clarity about what constitutes a NTR; there are different interpretations of how NTR is defined and evaluated; there are disciplinary silos within project teams that impede a holistic assessment of risk; and there is conflation between risk and root cause. These factors contribute to striking differences in perceptions of non-technical risks between professionals in project management versus their sustainability colleagues. A four step process is proposed to improve non-technical risk assessment, align project and sustainability professionals, and identify opportunities for mitigation measures. This work seeks to improve NTR management within mining, a sector that is under-represented in existing literature, by adding empirical research examining how project teams identify and assess non-technical risk and contributes to theory at the nexus of project management and sustainability
Business · CLARITY · Environmental resource management · Knowledge management · Management · Nexus (standard · Process (computing · Process management · Project management · Risk assessment · Risk management · Sustainability · Computer Science · Mining and Resource Management · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Tailings Management and Properties · Finance
The paths to social licence to operate
Conflict translates environmental and social risk into business costs
Social licence and mining
Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector
Creating sustainable value
Revisiting the Commons
From rational actor to efficient complexity manager
Conceptualising social risk and business risk associated with private sector development projects
Reconceptualising sustainability assessment
Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment
Conceptualising and managing trade-offs in sustainability assessment
How Many Interviews Are Enough
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |