Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The limits of the principle of charity

Why Haesebrouck is wrong after all

Bibliographic Data

ID12620853
AuthorsHenrik Friberg-Fernros, Henrik Friberg‐fernro (0000-0002-3645-8625, University of Gothenburg, corresponding author), Douglas Brommesson (0000-0001-6374-5964, Lund University)
Year2016
Volume53
Issue2
Pages277-283
Publication date2016-02-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1384-5748 • E-ISSN: 1740-3898
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1057/ip.2015.45
OpenAlexW2284305866
LanguageEN
References cited5

Argument (complex analysis · Doctrine · Human rights · Humanitarian intervention · Intervention (counseling · Law and economics · Political science · Proportionality (law · Responsibility to Protect · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Medicine · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • The feasibility of an expanded regime on the use of force

    Open Access•Douglas Brommesson, Henrik Friberg Fernros•Journal of International…•2012

  • The responsibility to protect doctrine – Coherent after all

    Open Access•Tim Haesebrouck•International Politics•2014

  • International political theory and the question of justice

    Open Access•Terry Nardin•International Affairs•2006

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae