Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals
A literature survey
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12624501 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bo‐Christer Björk (0000-0003-1545-9642, Hanken School of Economics, corresponding author), Bo-Christer Björk |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2019-07-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | El Profesional de la Informacion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1386-6710 • E-ISSN: 1699-2407 |
| Publisher | Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3145/epi.2019.jul.07 |
| OpenAlex | W2964481132 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 3 |
The acceptance rate of scholarly journals is an important selection criterion for authors choosing where to submit their manuscripts. Unfortunately, information about the acceptance (or rejection rates) of individual journals is seldom available. This article surveys available systematic information and studies of acceptance rates. The overall global average is around 35-40%. There are significant differences between fields of science, with biomedicine having higher acceptance rates compared to for instance the social sciences. Open access journals usually have higher acceptance rates than subscription journals, and this is particularly true for so-called OA mega-journals, which have peer review criteria focusing on sound science only
Biomedicine · Library science · Peer review · Political science · Publishing · Scholarly communication · Selection (genetic algorithm · Social acceptance · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Computer Science · Law · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Social Psychology
Open Access Zeitschriften in den Bildungs- und Erziehungswissenschaften
Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting Covid-19-related literature
Testing the Robustness of Cope’s Characterization of Predatory Publishing on a Cope Member Publisher (Academic and Business Research Institute)
How lonely or influential is the Lone Wolf? An analysis of individual scholars’ solo-authorship dynamics
A systematic approach to assessing the accuracy of a peer review process in an academic journal
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |