A systematic approach to assessing the accuracy of a peer review process in an academic journal
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21442248 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J A Garcia (0000-0002-6179-9229, Universidad de Granada, corresponding author), Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez, Rosa Rodríguez‐Sánchez (0000-0001-7886-9329, Universidad de Granada, corresponding author), J Fdez-Valdivia, J Fdez‐Valdivia (0000-0001-7181-1554, Universidad de Granada, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 130 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 6323-6347 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Scientometrics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-025-05452-6 |
| OpenAlex | W4415759866 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 30 |
Interpretation (philosophy) · Peer review · Predictive value · Process (computing) · Quality (philosophy) · Value (mathematics) · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Expert finding and Q&A systems · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Peer-review practices of psychological journals
Bias in peer review
Scientific peer review
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions
Confirmatory bias in peer review
Do competitive forces tend to correct choice errors in journal selection due to imperfect attention on the part of researchers
Arbitrariness in the peer review process
Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals
| Highly cited | No |
|---|