Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparing the Impacts of Different Risk Communication Policy Designs on Public Risk Perceptions

An Experiment in a Nuclear Power Plant Siting Scenario

Bibliographic Data

ID12626797
AuthorsLei Zhou (0000-0003-0741-5703, Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Yue Guo (0000-0003-3452-8965, Beijing Normal University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume27
Issue2
Pages190-209
Publication date2025-01-13
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1387-6988 • E-ISSN: 1572-5448
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13876988.2024.2442575
OpenAlexW4406346025
LanguageEN
References cited85

Biology · Business · Economics · Environmental economics · Nuclear power · Nuclear power plant · Perception · Power (physics · Public economics · Risk analysis (engineering · Risk communication · Risk perception · Disaster Management and Resilience · Psychology · Risk and Safety Analysis · Risk Perception and Management

  • Public support for ‘soft’ versus ‘hard’ public policies

    Open Access•Sanchayan Banerjee, Manu M Savani et al.•Journal of Behavioral Public…•2021

  • Policy Problems and Policy Design

    B Peters, B Guy Peters•Policy Problems and Policy Design•2018

  • Designing Public Policies

    Michael Howlett•Designing Public Policies•2019

  • Communicating scientific uncertainty

    Open Access•Baruch Fischhoff, Alex Davis et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2014

  • The Evolving Field of Risk Communication

    Open Access•Dominic H P Balog‐Way, Katherine A Mccomas et al.•Risk Analysis•2020

  • Trust and Risk Perception

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist•Risk Analysis•2021

  • Assessing what to address in science communication

    Open Access•W Bruine De Bruin, Ann Bostrom•Proceedings of the National…•2013

  • How a Nuclear Power Plant Accident Influences Acceptance of Nuclear Power

    Open Access•Vivianne H M Visschers, Vivianne Visschers et al.•Risk Analysis•2013

  • Policy mixes for sustainability transitions

    Open Access•Friederike Kern, Karoline S Rogge et al.•Research Policy•2019

  • Reconstructing the public in old and new governance

    Open Access•Hyomin Kim•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • Risk, communication and trust

    Open Access•Emma Engdahl, R Lidskog•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • Framing, the Media, and Risk Communication in Policy Debates

    Matthew C Nisbet•The Sage Handbook of Risk…•2015

  • The Fukushima Effect

    Richard Hindmarsh, Rebecca Priestley•Fukushima Effect•2015

  • Risk Society

    Ulrich Beck•Encyclopedia of Social Theory•2005

  • Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged

    Open Access•Baruch Fischhoff•Risk Analysis•1995

  • Searching for New Directions for Energy Policy

    Open Access•Byoung Joon Kim, Seoyong Kim et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • What's the ‘fracking’ problem? One word can’t say it all

    Open Access•Darrick Evensen, Jeffrey Jacquet et al.•The Extractive Industries and…•2014

  • Policy-Makers, Policy-Takers and Policy Tools

    Michael Howlett, M Ramesh et al.•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2020

  • Policy Analysis of Instrument Design

    Cali Curley, Richard Feiock et al.•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2020

  • Comparing Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools

    Open Access•Karol Olejniczak, Paweł Śliwowski et al.•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2020

  • Dealing with the Dark Side of Policy-Making

    Michael Howlett•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2020

  • Intersecting frames in communicating environmental risk and uncertainty

    Jonathon P Schuldt, Katherine A Mccomas et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2017

  • Four questions for risk communication

    Roger E Kasperson, Roger Kasperson•Journal of Risk Research•2014

  • The mediation of news framing between public trust and nuclear risk reactions in post-Fukushima China

    Hongfeng Qiu, Suwei Weng et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2020

  • Perception of risk

    Michael Siegrist, Heinz Gutscher et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2005

  • Dancing on a tightrope

    Open Access•Yuming Wei, Yue Guo et al.•Public Administration•2020

  • Robust crisis communication in turbulent times

    Open Access•Wei Zhong, Qian Hu et al.•Public Administration•2022

  • Designing policy resilience

    Open Access•Daniel Béland, Michael Howlett et al.•Policy Sciences•2020

  • Trade-offs versus reassurance

    Open Access•Lejla Dervišević, Leigh Raymond et al.•Policy Sciences•2021

  • Learning through conflict

    Open Access•Paul C Stern•Policy Sciences•1991

  • The role of actors in the policy design process

    Open Access•Leonore Haelg, Sebastian Sewerin et al.•Policy Sciences•2019

  • The effect of risk communication on the acceptance of policies for high-risk facilities in South Korea

    Open Access•Dae Woong Lee, Dae-Woong Lee et al.•International Review of…•2019

  • Risk society

    Ulrich Beck•Risikogesellschaft•1992

  • Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools

    Anne L Schneider, Anne Schneider et al.•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • Conceptualising policy design in the policy process

    Saba Siddiki, Cali Curley•Policy & Politics•2022

  • The idea of policy design

    Open Access•Hk Colebatch•Public Policy and Administration•2018

  • Policy instrument designed to gain transition legitimacy

    Open Access•Yixin Dai•Environmental Innovation and…•2019

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae