Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Navigating the Nexus of ethical standards and moral values

Bibliographic Data

ID12626868
AuthorsTeresa Hammerschmidt (0000-0003-2164-3825, University of Bamberg, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume27
Issue2
Publication date2025-03-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthics and Information Technology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1388-1957 • E-ISSN: 1572-8439
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s10676-025-09826-5
OpenAlexW4409338860
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited87

This study examines how ethical standards established by stakeholders such as developers and policymakers provide top-down guidance aligned with deontological ethics or utilitarian goals. It also highlights a complementary bottom-up approach, rooted in virtue ethics, in which individuals engage in ethical deliberations shaped by their moral values. Both approaches have limitations, and, at times, ethical standards can clash with moral values, thus blurring lines of responsibilities. Deontological principles may offer a structured framework, but often lack adaptability to diverse cultural contexts; bottom-up approaches foster intrinsic moral intentions, but universal applicability may be challenging, thus raising moral dilemmas. Through a theoretical literature review, this study explains how different ontological and normative ethical perceptions lead to moral dilemmas in various AI application scenarios (e.g., algorithmically managed platforms, crime detection systems, medical AI assistants). It addresses top-down and bottom-up approaches that may help account for moral dilemmas ethically. The study discusses the balance between top-down regulatory frameworks and bottom-up community-driven ethics to navigate the complex ethical landscape of AI applications, whose increasing capabilities alter expectations of AI’s agency and morality. This study calls for holistic and multi-objective ethical frameworks that incorporate diverse normative ethical perspectives and recognizes context-specific ontologies throughout the AI lifecycle. It emphasizes a nuanced and context-specific combination of top-down standards (e.g., regulatory oversight, clear guidelines) and bottom-up fostering of moral values (e.g., by improving ethical knowledge). This tailored and ongoing reflection of ethical standards and moral values accounts for an ethical development, deployment, and utilization of AI technologies

Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Ethical values · Nexus (standard · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Ethics in Business and Education · Ethics in medical practice · Philosophy

  • Toward an integrated multilevel framework for AI moral literacy

    Open Access•Jerome Cleofas•AI & Society•2026

  • Shaping technology/building society

    John Law, Wiebe E Bijker•Shaping technology/building society•1992

  • Managing Artificial Intelligence

    Nicholas Berente, Bin Gu et al.•MIS Quarterly•2021

  • The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior

    Scott J Reynolds, Tara L Ceranic•Journal of Applied Psychology•2007

  • The Ethics of AI Ethics

    Open Access•Thilo Hagendorff•Minds and Machines•2020

  • The Nature, Importance, and Difficulty of Machine Ethics

    Open Access•James H Moor•IEEE Intelligent Systems•2006

  • Incorporating Ethics into Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Amitai Etzioni, Oren Etzioni•The Journal of Ethics•2017

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI)

    Open Access•Yogesh K Dwivedi, Laurie Hughes et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Philipp Mayring•Approaches to Qualitative…•2015

  • Ethical Implications and Accountability of Algorithms

    Open Access•Kirsten Martins, Kirsten Martin•Journal of Business Ethics•2019

  • Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability

    Open Access•Mark Coeckelbergh•Science and Engineering Ethics•2020

  • Whose morality? Which rationality? Challenging artificial intelligence as a remedy for the lack of moral enhancement

    Open Access•Silviya Serafimova•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2020

  • AI recruitment algorithms and the dehumanization problem

    Open Access•Megan Fritts, Fernando Cabrera et al.•Ethics and Information Technology•2021

  • Can the predictive processing model of the mind ameliorate the value-alignment problem

    Open Access•William Ratoff•Ethics and Information Technology•2021

  • Moral sensitivity and the limits of artificial moral agents

    Open Access•Joris Graff•Ethics and Information Technology•2024

  • Understanding responsibility in Responsible AI. Dianoetic virtues and the hard problem of context

    Open Access•Mihaela Constantinescu, Cristina Voinea et al.•Ethics and Information Technology•2021

  • The possibility of deliberate norm-adherence in AI

    Open Access•Danielle Swanepoel•Ethics and Information Technology•2021

  • A critical perspective on guidelines for responsible and trustworthy artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Banu Buruk, Perihan Elif Ekmekçi et al.•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2020

  • A Comparative Defense of Self-initiated Prospective Moral Answerability for Autonomous Robot harm

    Open Access•Marc Champagne, Ryan Tonkens•Science and Engineering Ethics•2023

  • Artificial Moral Responsibility

    Open Access•Daniel W Tigard•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2021

  • Human moral reasoning types in autonomous vehicle moral dilemma

    Open Access•Jimin Rhim, Gi-bbeum Lee et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2020

  • An Ethical Inquiry of the Effect of Cockpit Automation on the Responsibilities of Airline Pilots

    Open Access•W David Holford•Journal of Business Ethics•2022

  • The Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) For Meaningful Work

    Open Access•Sarah Bankin, Paul Formosa•Journal of Business Ethics•2023

  • The Implications of Diverse Human Moral Foundations for Assessing the Ethicality of Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Jake B Telkamp, Marc H Anderson•Journal of Business Ethics•2022

  • Artificial Intelligence and Declined Guilt

    Open Access•Marilyn Giroux, Jungkeun Kim et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2022

  • Accountability in artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Claudio Novelli, Mariarosaria Taddeo et al.•AI & Society•2024

  • Operationalising AI ethics

    Open Access•Javier Camacho Ibáñez, Mónica Villas Olmeda•AI & Society•2022

  • On the moral status of social robots

    Open Access•Kęstutis Mosakas•AI & Society•2021

  • What to Expect From IEEE 7000

    Open Access•Sarah Spiekermann•IEEE Technology and Society…•2021

  • Materiality, Sociomateriality, and Socio-Technical Systems

    Paul M Leonardi•Materiality and organizing•2012

  • Posthumanist Performativity

    K Barad•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2003

  • Artificial Intelligence and Impression Management

    Open Access•C G Endacott, Paul M Leonardi•Human Communication Research•2022

  • AI in interpreting

    Open Access•Ildikó Horváth•Across Languages and Cultures•2022

  • Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions

    Open Access•Min Kyung Lee•Big Data & Society•2018

  • The sociomateriality of organisational life

    Wanda J Orlikowski•Cambridge Journal of Economics•2009

  • Patiency is not a virtue

    Open Access•Joanna J Bryson•Ethics and Information Technology•2018

  • Artificial intelligence ethics by design. Evaluating public perception on the importance of ethical design principles of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Katharina Kieslich, Birte Keller et al.•Big Data & Society•2022

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae