Illuminating the path

A methodological exploration of grounded theory in doctoral theses

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12645499
AutoresLaura M Guerrero Puerta (0000-0002-3700-8757, Universidad de Granada, autor de correspondencia), Rocio Lorente García (0000-0003-2562-4955, Universidad de Granada)
Año2023
Volumen24
Número4
Páginas384-393
Fecha de publicación2023-11-24
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaQualitative Research Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1443-9883 • E-ISSN: 1448-0980
EditorialEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/qrj-07-2023-0119
OpenAlexW4388989039
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas17

Purpose This article explores challenges faced by doctoral candidates using grounded theory (GT) in their theses, focusing on coding, theory development and time constraints. It also examines the impact of doctoral committees on GT dissertations, addressing epistemological clashes and the desire for familiarity over novelty. Design/methodology/approach Drawing from a multilevel autoethnography and related literature, this study offers pragmatic solutions and strategies for a seamless research journey. Findings Coding, theory development and time constraints pose universal challenges, requiring mentorship for effective navigation. Addressing committee dynamics is crucial for developing novel theoretical frameworks. Originality/value The article empowers researchers to overcome GT challenges, delving into various positions within the GT paradigm, fostering transparency and facilitating original contributions to their fields

Autoethnography · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Grounded theory · Mentorship · Novelty · Originality · Political science · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Transparency (behavior · Computer Science · Engineering · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Applications · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social Psychology