The development of the Outcomes Star
A participatory approach to assessment and outcome measurement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12652245 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joy Mackeith (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 98-106 |
| Publication date | 2011-08-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Housing Care and Support (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1460-8790 • E-ISSN: 2042-8375 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/14608791111199778 |
| OpenAlex | W2068925294 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 10 |
Purpose This paper seeks to describe the development process for the Outcomes Stars as a suite of tools which are designed to simultaneously measure and support change when working with vulnerable people as service users. It describes the original process of development of the first Star, in homelessness services in the UK, and subsequent roll out to other client groups and in other countries. The paper indicates the theoretical and philosophical under‐pinning of an approach which aims to embody both research and values‐based practice in empowerment and respect for the individual. Design/methodology/approach As a case study of development by the development team, the paper is based on first‐hand knowledge but builds upon extensive consultations with practitioners and users and relates these to the needs and strengths of service users, the contemporary policy framework, and wider research in the field. Findings The Outcomes Star draws on the core principles of Action Research and Participatory Action Research and extends them beyond research into assessment and outcome measurement. As yet there has been no formal research on the usefulness of the Star approach; but, there is a rapid take up of this approach within the UK and further afield. The paper argues that the approach has proved popular, because the Outcomes Star is rooted in a philosophy that is more in tune with that of people delivering services and more closely reflects the reality of those receiving services, compared to traditional measurement techniques. Practical implications The paper aims to stimulate further thought and effective practice in measuring outcomes for vulnerable people, and on the most useful means to engage and support people in the co‐production of their own futures. Originality/value Although the development and take‐up of the Outcomes Star approach has been rapid in practice, this is the first paper in which these more theoretical and philosophical roots have been outlined and explored in such depth. It will be of use to service providers, to deepen their awareness, and to commissioners, policy makers and regulatory bodies wishing to promote practical approaches to quality assurance of evidence‐based and evidence‐generating practice. It will also be of interest to moral philosophers and others wishing to understand the translation of values into social practice
Action (physics · Action research · Business · Citizen journalism · Empowerment · Engineering ethics · Field (mathematics · Knowledge management · Management science · Outcome (game theory · Participatory action research · Pedagogy · Political science · Process (computing · Process management · Service (business · Service delivery framework · Sociology · Star (game theory · Suite · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Engineering · Homelessness and Social Issues · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Social Work Education and Practice · Marketing
Evaluer l’impact social d’une entreprise sociale
Assessing Family Functioning
The development of a healing model of care for an Indigenous drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation service
Psychometric validation of the Homelessness Star
Scoping review and concept analysis of early adolescents’ emotional skills
Unsubstantiated conclusions about the Family Star Plus as an outcome measure
Assessing the reliability and validity of an outcomes star
Assessing the reliability of the Outcomes Star in research and practice
Measuring outcomes experienced by users of community services—The development of the community services outcomes tree and the associated survey template
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,75 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2025 (12) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |