The democratization of hacking and making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12656249 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jeremy Hunsinger (0000-0002-2408-0506, Wilfrid Laurier University, corresponding author), Andrew Schrock (University of Southern California) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 535-538 |
| Publication date | 2016-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Media & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-4448 • E-ISSN: 1461-7315 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461444816629466 |
| OpenAlex | W2312734561 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
We have framed the theme of this issue as “The Democratization of Hacking and Making” to draw attention to the relationships between action, knowledge, and power. Particularly, hacking and making are about how practices of creation and transformation generate knowledge and influence institutions. These acts concentrate and distribute power through publics and counterpublics. Yet, the very mutability of hacker and maker relations makes them a challenge to identify and research. Hacking and making collectives have proven capable of constituting and reconstituting themselves in physical and virtual spaces. They integrate across infrastructures, collaborative systems, socio-economic divides, and international boundaries. Hacking and making movements are plural and diverse, but in no way are they entirely new. These movements have specific histories, cultures, and traditions. As they quickly sprawl across national and geographic boundaries, they tend to forget those stories and lineages. This function of forgetting also occurs in a cyclical fashion in the public and research communities. The public has become aware of the popularization of hacking and making mostly through moments of emergency and scandal. Forgetting serves a function for the public, allowing them to get on with their own interests. Concurrently, this public forgetting allows hackers to regain their spaces of creativity and action. Maker culture, too, forgets in order to find a perpetual sense of novelty in their very existence. Forgetting, an important social and cultural project, is also part of the democratic project. Democracies forget to put aside old tensions and re-form in order for the public to support them. Thus, although each article considers fundamentally democratic concerns of access, participation, and collaboration, these questions are couched in just one set of
Action (physics · Computer security · Democracy · Democratization · Forgetting · Function (biology · Hacker · Media studies · Plural · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Computer Science · Innovative Human-Technology Interaction · Law · Psychology
Benefits and the hidden face of the maker movement
Routledge Handbook of Media Geographies
Digital Media and Grassroots Anti-Corruption
From clicktivism to hacktivism
Laboratories for news? Experimenting with journalism hackathons
Interrogating Innovation
Curators of digital futures
The fragility of curating a pioneer community
The limits of the Maker ideology
Enjoy your feeling”
Welcome to the Mommy Wars, Ladies”
Mass imagineering, mass customization and mass production
Deciphering Code
Jenseits der Disruption
Political civic tech in South Korea and civic hackers' rearticulation of digital citizenship
Characterizing Hacking
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,78 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 15 |