Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mitigation for minors

Exploring the nuances of social constructs and legal status in structuring sentences for youthful offenders

Bibliographic Data

ID12664629
AuthorsMegan C Kurlychek (0000-0003-3791-3391, University at Albany, State University of New York, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume20
Issue4
Pages498-522
Publication date2017-06-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePunishment & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1462-4745 • E-ISSN: 1741-3095
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1462474517708559
OpenAlexW2624182459
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited30

New York State is one of only two states in the nation that processes all 16- and 17-year-old defendants as adults. Contrary to this seemingly punitive stance, the state also maintains a Youthful Offender Statute that requires mitigated punishments for youths up to their 19th birthday upon court designation of youthful offender status. This study empirically examines the individual and combined impact of the social status of being a “minor” and the legally awarded status of being designated a youthful offender, upon adult court sentencing decisions framing the discussion within broader conceptualizations of youthfulness, culpability, and punishment. Utilizing a population of all youths ages 16–21 whose cases were disposed in New York between 2000 and 2006, this study finds the legally defined status of youthful offender to provide much greater mitigation at sentencing than the more general social status of being a minor. Findings are discussed as they relate to categorical and individualized assessments of culpability. In addition, as the study finds individualized assessments of culpability to be related to factors such as gender and race, broader implications for the role of court assigned statuses and mitigation of punishment are offered

Criminology · Culpability · Framing (construction · Minor (academic · Political science · Punishment (psychology · Punitive damages · Statute · Child Abuse and Trauma · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending · Social Psychology

  • Split Sentencing and the “Youth Discount” in Florida Criminal Courts

    Open Access•Peter S Lehmann•Crime & Delinquency•2024

  • Sentencing for Youthful Offenders

    Open Access•Yu Du, Megan C Kurlychek et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2025

  • Emerging adulthood and sentencing in Minnesota, 2016–2019

    Open Access•Yu Du, Andrew Kuo•Journal of Criminal Justice•2026

  • The Legacy of Slavery and Mass Incarceration

    Aaron Gottlieb, Kalen Flynn•Social Service Review•2021

  • The Effect of Public Defender and Support Staff Caseloads on Incarceration Outcomes for Felony Defendants

    Open Access•Aaron Gottlieb, Kelsey Arnold•Journal of the Society for Social…•2021

  • Bad Kids

    Barry C Feld•Bad kids•1999

  • Priming unconscious racial stereotypes about adolescent offenders.

    Sandra Lauderdale Graham, Sandra Graham et al.•Law and Human Behavior•2004

  • Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development

    Open Access•B J Casey, Jay N Giedd et al.•Biological Psychology•2000

  • Brain development in children and adolescents

    Open Access•Rhoshel Lenroot, Rhoshel K Lenroot et al.•Neuroscience & Biobehavioral…•2006

  • Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables

    James Tobin•Econometrica•1958

  • Toward a Jurisprudence of Youth Violence

    Franklin E Zimring•Crime and Justice•1998

  • Ethnicity Effects on Sentence Outcomes in Large Urban Courts

    Open Access•Stephen Demuth, Darrell Steffensmeier•Social Science Quarterly•2004

  • Courting Kids

    Open Access•Susan M Kunkle•Political Science Quarterly•2014

  • Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report

    Laurence Steinberg, Dustin Albert et al.•Developmental Psychology•2008

  • The Interaction of Race, Gender, and Age in Criminal Sentencing

    Open Access•Darrell Steffensmeier, J T Ulmer et al.•Criminology•1998

  • Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Sentencing Departures Across Modes of Conviction

    Open Access•Brian D Johnson•Criminology•2003

  • The Juvenile Penalty

    Open Access•Megan C Kurlychek, Brian D Johnson•Criminology•2004

  • Racial and Ethnic Differences in Pretrial Release Decisions and Outcomes

    Open Access•Stephen Demuth•Criminology•2003

  • Sentencing in Context

    Open Access•J T Ulmer, Brian Johnson et al.•Criminology•2004

  • Juvenility and Punishment

    Open Access•Megan C Kurlychek, Brian D Johnson•Criminology•2010

  • Brain imaging, culpability and the juvenile death penalty

    Jay D Aronson•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2007

  • Racial Disparities in Official Assessments of Juvenile Offenders

    George S Bridges, Sara Steen•American Sociological Review•1998

  • Sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines

    Open Access•Celesta A Albonetti•Law & Society Review•1997

  • Youthful Offender Designations and Sentencing in the New York Criminal Courts

    Ruth D Peterson•Social Problems•1988

  • The color of juvenile justice

    Open Access•Jamie J Fader, Megan C Kurlychek et al.•Social Science Research•2014

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae