Are subsidies for climate action effective? Two case studies in the Netherlands
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12666014 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anne M Van Valkengoed (0000-0002-2319-4341, University of Groningen, corresponding author), Ellen van der Werff (0000-0003-0294-813X, University of Groningen) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 127 |
| Pages | 137-145 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Science & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1462-9011 • E-ISSN: 1873-6416 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.09.018 |
| OpenAlex | W3211228035 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 18 |
An often used policy instrument to promote climate change mitigation and adaptation action are subsidies. Yet, it remains unclear to what extent subsidies are effective in motivating behavioural change. Subsidies are effective if they lead to adoption of the behaviour by individuals different from those who would adopt otherwise. On the bases of two theoretical frameworks, we examine the effectiveness of two subsidy schemes in the Netherlands. In Study 1 (n = 151), we applied the Transtheoretical Model and argued that a subsidy for climate adaptation measures is effective if it not only attracts those in the action and preparation stages of the model, but also people in the precontemplation and contemplation stage. In Study 2 (n = 367), we applied the Diffusion of Innovations Theory and argued that a subsidy for electric vehicles is effective if it attracts not only innovators and early adopters, but also early and late majority adopters. In both studies, we examined the extent to which subsidies remove financial barriers and serve as a cue to action. In Study 1, we found that the subsidies primarily attracted people who were in the action and preparation stages. In Study 2, we found that a subsidy for electric vehicles did not attract more early and late majority adopters compared to those who adopted an electric vehicle without a subsidy. In both studies we found that the subsidy mainly served as a cue to action, and was less likely to remove financial barriers
Action (physics · Business · Early adopter · Economics · Market economy · Public economics · Subsidy · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Marketing
Guiding Green Value Co‐Creation for Sustainable Industrial Production
Incentives for the implementation and maintenance of urban blue-green infrastructure
Falling short in 2030
Pathways for future climate action planning in urban Ghana
A reverse distribution between synergistic effect and economic development
The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption
The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change
What drives home solar PV uptake? Subsidies, peer effects and visibility in Sweden
Testing Diffusion of Innovations Theory with data
The role of the private sector and citizens in urban climate change adaptation
A power primer
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |