Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From outcomes to practices

Measuring the commitment to sustainability of organisations

Bibliographic Data

ID12668488
AuthorsMatteo Mura (0000-0002-5762-2228, University of Bologna), Mariolina Longo (0000-0003-3369-3934, University of Bologna), Filippo Boccali (University of Bologna, corresponding author), Franco Visani (0000-0002-7401-1269, University of Bologna), Sara Zanni (0000-0002-4766-992X, University of Bologna)
Year2024
Volume160
Pages103868-103868
Publication date2024-08-24
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Science & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1462-9011 • E-ISSN: 1873-6416
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103868
OpenAlexW4401840297
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited105

To achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) outlined in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, organisations must transform their cultures and demonstrate high levels of commitment by developing sustainability-focused practices. However, existing measurement frameworks have often overlooked the concept of commitment or have used non-standardized approaches based on individual perceptions. Additionally, measurement approaches have tended to focus more on the final outcomes of sustainability initiatives rather than on the practices themselves, sometimes leading to behaviours that have undesired societal impacts, especially when short-term outcomes are emphasised. This study conceptualises commitment to sustainability as the relationship between a company's resources and its implemented practices. The paper introduces a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-based index designed to assess a company's environmental and social sustainability commitment. The approach was tested on a sample of 1411 Italian companies across six different industries. The findings demonstrate that this innovative index effectively captures the theoretical concept of commitment to sustainability. Furthermore, assessing social and environmental commitment separately provides a clearer picture than using a single indicator encompassing both dimensions, thereby offering a nuanced understanding that aligns with the comprehensive targets set by the 2030 Agenda. • Focusing solely on outcome-based indicators may be misleading and produce very reductive results. • The adoption of a single measure for the overall commitment of a company towards sustainability is improper. • The environmental and social components of sustainability should be decoupled to highlight their relative contribution. • An innovative DEA-based index focused on practices rather than outcomes sheds new light on SMEs’ sustainability commitment

Business · Economics · Environmental economics · Environmental resource management · Process management · Sustainability · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy

  • Data Envelopment Analysis of sustainable development performance with enterprise structure and data governance in Europe

    Open Access•Ward de Lange, Patricia B Rogetzer et al.•Sustainable Futures•2026

  • DEA-based index systems for addressing the United Nations’ SDGs

    Open Access•Vincent Charles, Ali Emrouznejad•Environmental Science & Policy•2024

  • Factor Analysis

    Jae-On Kim, Charles W Mueller et al.•Factor Analysis•1978

  • Evolving sustainably

    Open Access•Pratima Bansal•Strategic Management Journal•2005

  • Management research and the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs)

    Open Access•Simone Pizzi, Andrea Caputo et al.•Journal of Cleaner Production•2020

  • Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions

    A A King, Michael Lenox et al.•Academy of Management Journal•2000

  • Global Patterns in Students’ Views of Science and Interest in Science

    Open Access•Ralf A L F van Griethuijsen, Michiel W van Eijck et al.•Research in Science Education•2015

  • Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    Open Access•Gema Del Río Castro, María Camino González Fernández et al.•Journal of Cleaner Production•2021

  • From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk

    Patricia Bromley, Walter W Powell•Academy of Management Annals•2012

  • Means versus Ends in Opaque Institutional Fields

    Frank Wijen•Academy of Management Review•2014

  • Corporate Social Performance Revisited

    Donna J Wood•Academy of Management Review•1991

  • Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency

    Open Access•A Charnes, W W Cooper et al.•Management Science•1981

  • Organizations' engagement with sustainable development goals

    Open Access•Iñaki Heras Saizarbitoria, Laida Urbieta et al.•Corporate Social Responsibility…•2022

  • Walking and Talking Corporate Social Responsibility

    Open Access•Christopher Wickert, Andreas Georg Scherer et al.•Journal of Management Studies•2016

  • The Social Construction of Reputation

    Open Access•H Rao•Strategic Management Journal•1994

  • Measuring the efficiency of decision making units

    Open Access•A Charnes, W W Cooper et al.•European Journal of Operational…•1978

  • Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis

    Open Access•Rajiv D Banker, A Charnes et al.•Management Science•1984

  • Managing Legitimacy

    Mark C Suchman•Academy of Management Review•1995

  • The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education

    Open Access•Keith S Taber•Research in Science Education•2018

  • Corporate Environmental Disclosure Practices in Different National Contexts

    Open Access•María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez, Isabel Gallego-Alvarez et al.•Organization & Environment•2020

  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019

    United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs•The Sustainable Development Goals…•2019

  • Green supply chain management for a more sustainable manufacturing industry in China

    Open Access•Xuerou Sheng, LePing Chen et al.•Environment Development and…•2023

  • What drives environmental practices of SMEs

    Open Access•Brigitte Hoogendoorn, Daniela Guerra et al.•Small Business Economics•2015

  • Developing a social perspective to farm performance analysis

    Open Access•Mary Graham•Ecological Economics•2009

  • Integration

    Open Access•Mark Stafford‐Smith, David Grigg et al.•Sustainability Science•2016

  • Efficiency in Brazil's industrial sectors in terms of energy and sustainable development

    Open Access•Flávia de Castro Camioto, Enzo Barberio Mariano et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2013

  • The Private Sector and the SDGs

    Open Access•R Scheyvens, Glenn Banks et al.•Sustainable Development•2016

  • A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models

    Open Access•K A Bollen•Sociological Methods & Research•1989

  • The Iron Cage Revisited

    P Dimaggio, Paul J Dimaggio et al.•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Enhancing the Measurement of Composite Indicators of Corporate Social Performance

    Open Access•Juan Aparicio, Magdalena Kapelko•Social Indicators Research•2019

Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae