Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Two Historicisms

Unpacking the Rules of Reproduction Debate

Bibliographic Data

ID12672954
AuthorsJavier Moreno Zacarés (0000-0001-5918-3081, Leverhulme Early Career Fellow, Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume29
Issue3
Pages175-198
Publication date2021-09-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistorical Materialism (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1465-4466 • E-ISSN: 1569-206X
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/1569206x-12342030
OpenAlexW3167440440
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited33

Knafo and Teschke’s provocative essay ‘Political Marxism and the Rules of Reproduction of Capitalism’ has prompted considerable debate. From a position of critical support, the present article intervenes in this debate by making three interrelated points. First, the structuralist–historicist divide that Knafo and Teschke identify is misleading and should be reformulated. Though the duality is real, this divide is best understood as a continuum between two kinds of historicism: a structural and an institutional historicism. Second, the article contextualises Knafo and Teschke’s intervention against the backdrop of their own intellectual development. Rather than returning to the tradition’s historicist origins, they have in fact stretched Political Marxism’s institutional tendencies to new limits. Third, the article concludes with a revision of their critique of the concept of market dependence. It is argued that the concept can be salvaged for the purposes of institutional historicism provided that it is rearticulated

Capitalism · Critical theory · Epistemology · Historicism · Political science · Politics · Reproduction · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Economic Theory and Institutions · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism

  • Historical specificity and social form

    Open Access•Jack Copley, Alexis Moraitis et al.•Capital & Class•2026

  • Radical Historicism or Rules of Reproduction? New Debates in Political Marxism

    Maïa Pal•Historical Materialism•2021

  • The Making of Modern Finance

    Samuel Knafo•Making of Modern Finance•2013

  • Cores, Peripheries, and Globalization

    Ivan Berend, Peter Reill et al.•Cores, peripheries, and…•2011

  • How the West Came to Rule

    Alexander Anievas, Kerem Nişancıoğlu et al.•How the West Came to Rule•2015

  • The empire of civil society

    Justin Rosenberg•The empire of civil society•1994

  • Structuring Politics

    Open Access•Robert H Bates, Ellen Comisso et al.•Structuring Politics•1992

  • The 1713 Peace of Utrecht and its Enduring Effects

    Alfred H A Soons•The 1713 Peace of Utrecht and its…•2019

  • Historical institutionalism in comparative politics

    Open Access•Kathleen Thelen, Sven Steinmo•Structuring Politics•1992

  • The Brenner debate

    T H Aston•The Brenner debate•1985

  • The Origins of Capitalist Development

    Robert Brenner•Introduction to the sociology of…•1982

  • The American Road to Capitalism

    Open Access•C Post•Case Studies in the Origins of…•2019

  • Critical Methods in Political and Cultural Economy

    Johnna Montgomerie•Critical Methods in Political and…•2017

  • Case Studies in the Origins of Capitalism

    Open Access•Xavier Lafrance, Charles Post•Case Studies in the Origins of…•2019

  • The transition debate in Brazilian history

    Open Access•Pedro Salgado•Journal of Agrarian Change•2021

  • Bourgeois Revolution, State Formation and the Absence of the International

    Benno Teschke•Historical Materialism•2005

  • The Use and Misuse of Uneven and Combined Development

    C Post•Historical Materialism•2018

  • Political Marxism and the Rules of Reproduction of Capitalism

    Samuel Knafo, Benno Teschke•Historical Materialism•2020

  • The Myth of 1648

    Open Access•Ray Kiely•Journal of International…•2005

  • The Managerial Lineages of Neoliberalism

    Samuel Knafo, Sahil Jai Dutta et al.•New Political Economy•2018

  • The myth of the shareholder revolution and the financialization of the firm

    Samuel Knafo, Sahil Jai Dutta•Review of International Political…•2019

  • The gold standard and the origins of the modern international monetary system

    Samuel Knafo•Review of International Political…•2005

  • The changing ‘logics’ of capitalist competition

    Benno Teschke, Hannes Lacher•Cambridge Review of International…•2007

  • Critical approaches and the legacy of the agent/structure debate in international relations

    Samuel Knafo•Cambridge Review of International…•2010

  • Rethinking neoliberalism after the Polanyian turn

    Samuel Knafo•Review of Social Economy•2022

  • Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe

    Robert Brenner•Past & Present•1976

  • Why is There No International Historical Sociology

    Open Access•J Rosenberg•European Journal of International…•2006

  • The development of capitalism in housing provision

    Open Access•Michael Ball•International Journal of Urban…•1981

  • The Theory of Land Rent at the Crossroads

    Open Access•Anne Haila•Environment and Planning D…•1990

  • The fetishizing subject in Marx's Capital

    Open Access•Samuel Knafo•Capital & Class•2002

  • The Question of Market Dependence

    Open Access•Ellen Meiksins Wood•Journal of Agrarian Change•2002

  • English feudalism and the origins of capitalism

    George C Comninel•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2000

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.4
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae