Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Distorted policy transfer and institutional conflicts

The health insurance reform in South Korea

Bibliographic Data

ID12691024
AuthorsSeongjo Kim (0000-0003-2310-3064, Sunchon National University), Sun-Woo Lee (0000-0001-6151-5487, Jeonbuk National University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume23
Issue1
Pages18-33
Publication date2022-02-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJapanese Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1468-1099 • E-ISSN: 1474-0060
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1468109921000384
OpenAlexW4210831300
LanguageEN
References cited46

Why did Korea integrate multiple health insurers into a single insurance body in 2000? This study argues that the combination of institutional frictions and reinterpretations of them led to institutional changes by reshaping coalitions of healthcare policies. This study demonstrates how the interaction between institutional mismatches and policy feedbacks caused by policy transfer distortions and actors' ideas can trigger the institutional changes. When Korean policymakers adopted the Japanese health insurance system in the 1970s and 1980s, they deliberately modify some institutional sub-components to reflect the interests of bureaucrats and dominant groups. As a result, the mismatched institutional and ideational patterns created frictions for institutional changes. The self-governance of health insurance societies has hardly been achieved in Korea and it reduced individual health insurance societies to no more than a governmental body that collected contributions. In problem-solving mechanisms, there was a weak commitment for support such as loosely institutionalized finance assistance for rural health insurance schemes since the nascent democratic regime wanted to manipulate the subsidy for political reason, with low financial burden. Due to these distorted institutional practices, the health insurance system was seen as a symbol of the social exclusion of the disadvantaged and as a malfunctioning social policy stemming from an irresponsible government. Meanwhile, by reshaping its orientations and preferences, Korean labor reinterpreted the meaning of the health insurance system and socially oriented labor movements in Korea have formed a coalition with civil movement for the health insurance reform

Business · Disadvantaged · Economic growth · Economics · Government (linguistics · Health care · Market economy · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Social insurance · Subsidy · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Policy Transfer and Learning · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Health Policy

  • Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy

    Open Access•W Brian Arthur, W ARTHUR•Increasing returns and path…•1994

  • The Search for American Political Development

    Open Access•Karen Orren, Stephen Skowronek•Search for American Political…•2004

  • Wealth, Health, and Democracy in East Asia and Latin America

    Open Access•James W Mcguire•Wealth, Health, and Democracy in…•2010

  • Institutional Change and Globalization

    John L Campbell•Institutional Change and…•2004

  • The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism

    KARL-ORFEO FIORETOS, Adam D Sheingate et al.•Oxford Handbook of Historical…•2016

  • Politics in Time

    Paul Pierson•Politics in Time•2004

  • Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

    Open Access•Douglass C North•Institutions, Institutional…•1990

  • Dismantling the Welfare State?

    Open Access•Paul Pierson•Dismantling the Welfare State?•1994

  • Healthy Democracies

    Joseph Wong•Healthy Democracies•2006

  • Explaining Institutional Change

    Open Access•Kathleen Ann Thelen, Tulia Gabriela Falleti et al.•Explaining Institutional Change•2009

  • Korean Workers and Neoliberal Globalization

    Kevin Gray•Korean Workers and Neoliberal…•2013

  • The Logic of Political Survival

    Bruce Bueno De Mesquita, Alastair Smith et al.•The logic of political survival•2003

  • Social Traps and the Problem of Trust

    Open Access•Bo Rothstein•Social Traps and the Problem of…•2005

  • Who Learns What from Whom

    Open Access•David P Dolowitz, DAVID DOLOWITZ et al.•Political Studies•1996

  • Advocacy Coalitions and Health Politics in Korea

    Open Access•Huck‐ju Kwon•Social Policy and Administration•2007

  • Policy transfer

    D Marsh, Mark Evans•Policy Studies•2012

  • Distorted policy transfer? South Korea’s adaptation of UK social enterprise policy

    Chisung Park, Jooha Lee et al.•Policy Studies•2017

  • Adapting to democracy

    Open Access•Joseph Wong•Studies in Comparative…•2005

  • Policy Change and Soft Europeanization

    Open Access•Stella Ladi•Public Administration•2011

  • Variation in Institutional Strength

    Steven Levitsky, María Victoria Murillo•Annual Review of Political Science•2009

  • Divergent Constitution of Liberal Regimes

    Open Access•Hyeong-Ki Kwon•Politics & Society•2003

  • Revisiting the Role of Labor

    Open Access•Dennie Oude Nijhuis•World Politics•2009

  • Learning from Abroad

    Open Access•David P Dolowitz, D Marsh•Governance•2000

  • Dysfunctional Policy Transfer in National Tax Blacklists

    Open Access•J C Sharman•Governance•2010

  • When Policies Undo Themselves

    Open Access•Alan M Jacobs, R Kent Weaver•Governance•2015

  • The legislature and agenda politics of social welfare

    Open Access•Jaemin Shim•Democratization•2019

  • Political Learning and Democratic Consolidation

    Open Access•Jongryn Mo•Comparative Political Studies•1996

  • When Do Institutions “Bite”? Historical Institutionalism and the Politics of Institutional Change

    Open Access•Giovanni Capoccia•Comparative Political Studies•2016

  • The Autocratic Welfare State

    Open Access•Carl Henrik Knutsen, Magnus Bergli Rasmussen et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2018

  • Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics

    Kathleen Thelen, Kathy Thelen•Annual Review of Political Science•1999

  • Left is right and right is left? Partisan difference on social welfare and particularistic benefits in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan

    Open Access•Jaemin Shim•Journal of International and…•2020

  • Of Roles and Rules

    Open Access•Steve Leach, Vivien Lowndes•Public Policy and Administration•2007

  • Taking ideas and discourse seriously

    Open Access•Vivien A Schmidt•European Political Science Review•2010

  • Ideas, institutions, and policy change

    Daniel Béland•Journal of European Public Policy•2009

  • Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics

    Open Access•Paul Pierson•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Explanations of Institutional Change

    Open Access•Johannes Gerschewski•American Political Science Review•2021

  • Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order

    Open Access•Robert C Lieberman•American Political Science Review•2002

  • Politics and Institutionalism

    Elisabeth S Clemens, James M Cook•Annual Review of Sociology•1999

  • Path dependence in historical sociology

    Open Access•James Mahoney•Theory and Society•2000

  • The logic of social policy expansion in a neoliberal context

    Open Access•Oh-Jung Kwon•Theory and Society•2011

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae