Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What do Australian consumers think about current advertising standards

Bibliographic Data

ID12705151
AuthorsSandra C Jones (0000-0002-0258-3348, University of Wollongong, corresponding author), Katherine Eagleton (0000-0001-6973-0296, Centre for Health Initiatives University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales 2500 Australia)
Year2011
Volume12
Issue4
Pages315-325
Publication date2011-09-08
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Public Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1472-3891 • E-ISSN: 1479-1854
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/pa.424
OpenAlexW2042703676
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited16

The concept of community standards is the cornerstone of advertising self‐regulation in Australia. However, there is a dearth of research on current attitudes towards advertising and a virtual absence of such data in an Australian context. A questionnaire was developed to assess consumer attitudes towards advertising; respondents were 872 adults residing in New South Wales. We found high levels of concern regarding advertising standards in general and a consistent perception that advertising should not, for example, use coarse language or violent images, portray women or men as sex objects or show nudity, stereotype or make fun of groups of people, or convey messages that undermine parental authority. In relation to specific appeals and executional elements, although we identified numerous statistically significant demographic differences, there was a clear majority view as to what elements are unacceptable. That is, rather than the posited vocal ‘moral minority’, there is a consistency of views across the community on key issues of advertising standards. The finding that only a very small proportion of community‐based respondents knew how to make a complaint to the correct organisation suggests that studies utilising complainant samples are unlikely to be representative of those who are concerned about advertising. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Advertising · Business · Complaint · Consistency (knowledge bases · Context (archaeology · Geography · Perception · Political science · Stereotype (UML · Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Law · Media, Gender, and Advertising · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Self-regulation of Sexist Digital Advertising

    Open Access•David López Jiménez, Eduardo Carlos Dittmar et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2021

  • Publicidad ilícita en la mira

    Open Access•Priscila Chalá-Mejía, Priscila Chalá•Communication & Society•1970

  • Publicidad ilícita en la mira

    Open Access•Priscila Chalá-Mejía•Communication & Society•2015

  • Does the guerrilla win, if he does not lose? Advertising media practitioners' views on guerrilla marketing challenges and potential negative consequences

    Open Access•Theunis Roux•Journal of Public Affairs•2020

Citations per year0.07
Citation span1970 - 2021 (52)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae