Understanding the Effects of Gender Equality on Company's Performance
A Global Mid‐Cap Companies' Perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12705956 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rekha Dahiya (School of Management Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University Delhi India, corresponding author), Asjad Usmani (0000-0003-3953-212X, Department of Management Don Bosco Technical Institute Delhi India), Arvind Kumar (0009-0009-1715-5686, Stephen Young Institute for International Business University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Public Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1472-3891 • E-ISSN: 1479-1854 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/pa.70028 |
| OpenAlex | W4409320468 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 67 |
The present study is conceived with the objective of assessing gender equality measures in mid‐cap corporations and analysing the influence on company's performance. Based on gender equality scores of top 50 companies from Equileap's 2022 gender equality list; financial performance data from annual reports; and corporate responsibility scores from Sustainalytics, this study reveals that mid‐cap companies fared poorly on all gender equality metrics and does not completely embrace gender equality. Less than 50% of women directors are found on the boards of 70% of mid‐cap corporations. Women represented only 42% of company board of directors' positions and 32% of the executive leadership positions. A mean pay gap of 13.54% is observed in 85% of the mid‐cap companies. Gender equality accounted for 26% variation in the mid‐cap firms' financial performance. Initiatives to promote gender equality though do not affect the responsible behaviour of the mid‐cap firms. Novelty of the study lies in testing the gender equality claims of mid‐cap companies labelled as ‘top gender equal’ organisations across different sectors and ascertaining the influence of board's gender equality on firm's financial performance and responsible behaviour. The study makes a unique contribution to gender equality literature by proving that financial indicators are not enough to motivate corporate to truly embrace gender equality. Neither aspect like flexible working, training and work–life balance can be projected as the only measures for solving the issue of gender inequality. Results also contribute to social justification theory's literature by highlighting the fact that the theory promotes the ‘social stability’ or ‘status quo’ more than advancing the ‘social change’ when applied in the context of gender equality
Business · Economics · Gender equality · Management · Perspective (graphical · Sociology · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Mathematics
Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives
Gender equality in science, medicine, and global health
Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations
Transparency in Academic Recruitment
Interventions of Organizational Identification and Job Satisfaction on Person-Environment Perceptions and Work Engagement
Education, Equality and Human Rights
Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence
Antecedents and Consequences of System-Justifying Ideologies
Does Board Gender Diversity Influence Financial Performance? Evidence from Spain
India's regional disparity and its policy responses
Gender diversity and online intellectual capital disclosure
Twenty years of system justification theory
Change agents or defending the status quo? How senior leaders frame workplace gender equality
All that Glitters is Not Gold
You, Me, or Her
Gender in the Australian Public Service
Women on corporate boards and firm's financial performance
Protesting to challenge or defend the system? A system justification perspective on collective action
Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo
Corporate Board Quotas and Gender Equality Policies in the Workplace
CEOs as agents of change and continuity
A quarter century of system justification theory
The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness
Gender and Twenty-First-Century Corporate Crime
Pathways toward Change
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |