Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Democratic foundation and the boundary problem

One solution to two paradoxes

Bibliographic Data

ID12717536
AuthorsLeonardo Fiorespino (0000-0003-1980-073X, Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic, corresponding author)
Year2025
Publication date2025-05-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Political Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1474-8851 • E-ISSN: 1741-2730
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/14748851251337326
OpenAlexW4410543038
LanguageEN
References cited31

The article discusses the relationship between the boundary problem in democratic theory and the paradox of democratic foundation. It argues that although these famous “democratic paradoxes” are affected by an analogous logical difficulty and equally concur in grounding the legitimacy of a “people,” they are two different problems. The recognition of their distinction helps illuminate the complexity of practical normative judgments on the legitimacy of a people. The article analyzes four theories in search of an approach that can consistently resolve both paradoxes: the all-affected principle, Sofia Näsström's theory of democracy as a spirit of emancipation, Alessandro Ferrara's redefinition of the issue based on the distinction between ethnos and demos, and David Owen's proposal to bring together the all-affected and the all-subjected principles to solve the boundary problem. The article's conclusion points to a possible tension between the two paradoxes and raises a final question: can such a tension be resolved

Democracy · Foundation (evidence · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • The Spirit of Democracy

    Sofia Näsström•Spirit of Democracy•2021

  • The Force of the Example

    Alessandro Ferrara•The force of the example•2008

  • Democracy and Its Critics

    Jan Narveson, Philosophy Documentation Center•Teaching Philosophy•1990

  • Democracy and the All-Affected Principle

    Open Access•Eerik Lagerspetz•Res Cogitans•2015

  • The Problem(s) of Constituting the Demos

    Open Access•Kasper Lippert‐rasmussen, Andreas Bengtson•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2021

  • Finding a fundamental principle of democratic inclusion

    Open Access•Andreas Bengtson•Inquiry•2026

  • Transnationalizing the public sphere

    Open Access•Nancy Fraser•Identities, Affiliations, and…•2007

  • Authenticity in Culture, Self, and Society

    J P Williams, Phillip Vannini•Authenticity in Culture, Self,…•2016

  • Transnationalizing the Public Sphere

    Open Access•K Nash•Theory Culture & Society•2007

  • The boundary problem in democratic theory

    Open Access•Sarah Song•International Theory•2012

  • How to diagnose democratic deficits in global politics

    Open Access•Mathias Koenig-Archibugi•International Theory•2017

  • Constituting the polity, constituting the demos

    Open Access•D Owens•Ethics & Global Politics•2012

  • The boundaries of transnational democracy

    Open Access•Johan Karlsson Schaffer•Review of International Studies•2012

  • Towards a principle of most-deeply affected

    Open Access•Afsoun Afsahi•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2022

  • Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory

    John Rawls•The Journal of Philosophy•1980

  • Sovereignty Across Generations

    Alessandro Ferrara•Sovereignty Across Generations.…•2023

  • Philosophical investigations

    Ludwig Wittgenstein•Philosophical investigations•1974

  • Of Boats and Principles

    Open Access•Alessandro Ferrara•Political Theory•2001

  • Constitutional Democracy

    Open Access•Jürgen Habermas•Political Theory•2001

  • Dead Rights, Live Futures

    Open Access•Bonnie Honig, Bonnie Honig•Political Theory•2001

  • The Legitimacy of the People

    Open Access•Sofia Näsström•Political Theory•2007

  • The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle

    Open Access•Sofia Näsström•Political Studies•2011

  • The All-Affected Principle and the Question of Asymmetry

    Open Access•Andreas Bengtson•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives

    Open Access•Robert E Goodin•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2007

  • Democracy's Domain

    Open Access•David Miller•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2009

  • Liberalism, Samaritanism, and Political Legitimacy

    Open Access•Christopher Heath Wellman•Philosophy & Public Affairs•1996

  • Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem

    Open Access•David Miller•Philosophy Compass•2020

  • The Social Contract and The First and Second Discourses

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau, David Bromwich et al.•Social Contract and the First and…•2017

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae