Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle

Bibliographic Data

ID6345154
AuthorsSofia Näsström (0000-0002-3816-2035, Stockholm University, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume59
Issue1
Pages116-134
Publication date2011-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3217 • E-ISSN: 1467-9248
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x
OpenAlexW1694542360
LanguageEN
Citations received124
References cited32

This article examines the recent turn to the all-affected principle as a means to determine the proper boundaries of the people. The popularity of the principle notwithstanding, it argues that many of its proponents are prone to underestimating the challenge it raises to contemporary political theory. More specifically, two claims are made. Firstly, it argues that we must distinguish between two principles which, while both relating to the question of people-making, do so under radically different conditions: the all-subjected principle and the all-affected principle. Secondly, it argues that while the all-affected principle is a popular device in debates on cosmopolitan democracy it does not have a singular meaning. The all-affected principle in fact has three distinct roles to play, those of diagnosing, generating and justifying the boundaries of the people. The latter is the most difficult to account for in so far as it draws proponents of the all-affected principle into the very conflict that they set out to assess. It is concluded that this circumstance calls for a reorientation of the current debate, both with regard to the characterisation of the conflict under consideration and the challenge it raises to contemporary political theory

Democracy · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Meaning (existential · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Popularity · Positive economics · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Computer Science · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Political Theology and Sovereignty

  • Modus Vivendi Arrangements, Stability, and the All-Subjected Principle

    Open Access•Chiara Fumagalli•Rivista Italiana di Filosofia…•2022

  • The Spirit of Democracy

    Sofia Näsström•Spirit of Democracy•2021

  • Transnational Citizenship

    Open Access•Claus Leggewie•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Governance als Politische Theorie?

    Rainer Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer Schmalz‐Bruns•Regieren•2012

  • Doing Democracy Differently

    Open Access•Henrike Knappe•Doing Democracy Differently•2016

  • Doing Democracy Differently

    Open Access•Henrike Knappe•Doing Democracy Differently•2017

  • Why the All-Affected Principle Is Groundless

    Andreas Bengtson, Kasper Lippert‐rasmussen et al.•Journal of Moral Philosophy•2021

  • The Normative Power of Political Equality

    Open Access•Sofia Näsström•Political Equality in Transnational…•2013

  • Promoting Justice Across Borders

    Lucia M Rafanelli•Promoting Justice Across Borders•2021

  • Democracy and the All-Affected Principle

    Open Access•Eerik Lagerspetz•Res Cogitans•2015

  • The Humble Cosmopolitan

    Luis Cabrera, Luis Carrasco Cabrera•Humble Cosmopolitan•2020

  • Democracy Counts

    Open Access•Sofia Näsström•Transnational Actors in Global…•2010

  • Capabilities in a Just Society

    Open Access•Romy Claassen, Rutger Claassen•Capabilities in a Just Society•2018

  • Should Corporations Have the Right to Vote? A Paradox in the Theory of Corporate Moral Agency

    Open Access•John Hasnas•Journal of Business Ethics•2018

  • Beyond Subsidiarity

    Open Access•Colin W Rowe•Journal of Social Philosophy•2025

  • The Voting Rights of Senior Citizens

    Open Access•Andreas Bengtson, Andreas Albertsen•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2023

  • The Problem(s) of Constituting the Demos

    Open Access•Kasper Lippert‐rasmussen, Andreas Bengtson•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2021

  • Analysis of public attitudes towards “local agreements” on restarting nuclear power plants

    Tsuneko Nakazawa, Tomoyuki Tatsumi•Local Environment•2023

  • Disagreeing with ‘local agreement’

    Tsuneko Nakazawa, Takashi Nakazawa et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2022

  • Shared Inequity

    Open Access•Cedric E Dawkins•Journal of Business Ethics•2024

  • Property as power

    Open Access•Romy Claassen•Journal of Social Philosophy•2026

  • One person, one vote and the importance of baseline

    Open Access•Andreas Bengtson•Inquiry•2025

  • Finding a fundamental principle of democratic inclusion

    Open Access•Andreas Bengtson•Inquiry•2026

  • On Borders

    Paulina Ochoa Espejo•On Borders•2020

  • Democracy and Exclusion

    P T Lenard•Democracy and Exclusion•2023

  • The Cambridge Habermas Lexicon

    Open Access•Juan Carlos Velasco Arroyo, Amy Allen et al.•Cambridge Habermas Lexicon•2019

  • Brexit

    Open Access•Arturo Ezquerro•Group Analysis•2020

  • Advancing justice in marine biodiversity conservation

    Open Access•Christine Armstrong•Marine Policy•2025

  • The Right to Cultural Heritage in International Law, with Special Reference to Indigenous Peoples’ Rights

    Open Access•Karolina Sikora•Santander Art and Culture Law…•2021

  • A Cooperative Framework Incorporating the Concerns of Both Migrant-Destination and Migrant-Origin Countries into Migration Policymaking

    Open Access•Jacob Richard Thomas•Chinese Political Science Review•2025

  • Affected Interests and Their Institutions

    Open Access•Amit Ron•Democratic Theory•2017

  • Equality, Proportionality, and the All-Affected Principle

    Open Access•Jonas Hultin Rosenberg•Democratic Theory•2019

  • Winds of change

    Open Access•Eric Brandstedt, Holger Busch et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  • Deliberative engagement

    Open Access•John S Dryzek•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2015

  • The Politics of Non‐Existence

    Open Access•Maija Setälä•Politics and Governance•2024

  • La citoyenneté transnationale

    Open Access•Claus Leggewie•Sens public•2013

  • Diversity and cosmopolitan democracy

    Open Access•Luis Carrasco Cabrera•Global Constitutionalism•2015

  • Cosmopolitan Democratic and Communicative Rights

    Open Access•A Brown, Sune Laegaard•Human Rights Review•2020

  • Why democracy must be global

    Open Access•Hans Agné•International Theory•2010

  • Debatable lands

    Open Access•David Miller•International Theory•2014

  • The boundary problem in democratic theory

    Open Access•Sarah Song•International Theory•2012

  • How to diagnose democratic deficits in global politics

    Open Access•Mathias Koenig-Archibugi•International Theory•2017

  • Individual rights and the democratic boundary problem

    Open Access•Luis Carrasco Cabrera•International Theory•2014

  • Why withdrawal from the European Union is undemocratic

    Open Access•Tore Vincents Olsen, Christian F Rostbøll•International Theory•2017

  • Transboundary associations as agents of boundary transformation

    Open Access•Tuomo Käkelä•Journal of Global Ethics•2023

  • With pulling ties, electoral participation flies

    Open Access•Johanna Peltoniemi, Miroslav Nemčok et al.•European Political Science•2023

  • Inclusion as Deliberative Agency

    Open Access•Nicole Curato, Jonathan Corpus Ong•Television & New Media•2014

  • Making Representations

    Henrike Knappe, Oscar Schmidt•Global Environmental Politics•2021

  • Democratic foundation and the boundary problem

    Open Access•Leonardo Fiorespino•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • Contestatory Cosmopolitanism, Neoliberal Rationality and Global Protests

    Camil-Alexandru Pârvu, Camil Alexandru Parvu•Globalizations•2016

  • Democracy, respect for judgement and disagreement on democratic inclusion

    Open Access•Jonas Hultin Rosenberg•Critical Review of International…•2020

  • If you polluted, you’re included

    David Matias Paaske, Jakob Thrane Mainz•Critical Review of International…•2023

  • The UN Security Council, normative legitimacy and the challenge of specificity

    Antoinette Scherz, Alain Zysset•Critical Review of International…•2019

  • Transnational citizenship and the democratic state

    D Owens•Critical Review of International…•2011

  • Who are the people? Associative freedom and the democratic boundary problem

    Open Access•Frank Dietrich•Critical Review of International…•2023

  • Toward an unadulterated democracy

    Toby Rollo•Critical Review of International…•2026

  • Nonhuman animals and the all affected interests principle

    Pablo Magaña•Critical Review of International…•2022

  • Should refugees in the European Union have voting rights

    Ali Emre Benli•Critical Review of International…•2022

  • Should refugees govern refugee camps

    Open Access•Felix Bender•Critical Review of International…•2021

  • Toward an assessment of marginality in democratic systems

    Open Access•Andrea Felicetti, Pietro Castelli Gattinara•The British Journal of Politics…•2018

  • A Cosmopolitan Reading of Modern Monetary Theory

    Open Access•Konsta Kotilainen•Global Society•2021

  • Political Representation Practice in Global Environmental Politics. Feminist Representation Theory and the Claims of Marginalized Youth Groups

    Henrike Knappe•Global Society•2023

  • The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory

    Open Access•Pablo Magaña•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2023

  • A Fluid Demos for a Hypermigration Polity

    Open Access•Enrico Biale•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2017

  • Where Democracy Should Be

    Open Access•Andreas Bengtson•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2021

  • Freedom as Non-domination and Democratic Inclusion

    Open Access•Ludvig Beckman, Jonas Hultin Rosenberg•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2017

  • Commuters, Located Life Interests, and the City's Demos

    Open Access•Lior Glick•Journal of Political Philosophy•2020

  • The State Made Me Do It

    Open Access•David V Axelsen•Journal of Political Philosophy•2012

  • Looking at the World Bank’s safeguard reform through the lens of deliberative democracy

    Open Access•Ruth Houghton•Leiden Journal of International Law•2019

  • The concept of affectedness in international development

    Open Access•Giedre Jokubauskaite•World Development•2019

  • Peaceful Use of Lasers in Space

    Open Access•Petr Boháček, Pavel Dufek et al.•Alternatives Global Local Political•2021

  • A Solidarity Framework for Representing Suffering

    Open Access•Anita Varma•Journal of Communication Inquiry•2025

  • Postnational memory

    Open Access•Nadim Khoury•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2020

  • Towards a principle of most-deeply affected

    Open Access•Afsoun Afsahi•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2022

  • Inclusive deliberation for future-regarding governance

    Open Access•Maija Setälä•Policy Studies•2025

  • The contestable peoplehood account of democratically legitimate boundaries

    Open Access•Tara Ginnane•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • Can Empathy Provide a Route to Democratic Inclusivity

    Open Access•Keith Hyams•Political Studies•2024

  • The Extraterritoriality of the European Convention on Human Rights

    Open Access•Samantha Besson•Leiden Journal of International Law•2012

  • An indirect legitimacy argument for a directly elected European Parliament

    Open Access•Christopher Lord•European Journal of Political…•2017

  • Banishing dominance in Europe

    Open Access•Erik Oddvar Eriksen•European Journal of International…•2020

  • They Always Get Our Story Wrong

    Open Access•Anita Varma, Brad Limov et al.•Media and Communication•2023

  • Moral solidarity as a news value

    Open Access•Anita Varma•Journalism•2022

  • Conceptualizing and evaluating (new) forms of citizenship between nationalism and cosmopolitanism

    Andrea Schlenker, Joachim Blatter•Democratization•2013

  • Ontological security and the limits to a common world

    Catarina Kinnvall, Ted Svensson•Postcolonial Studies•2017

  • The quest for the legitimacy of the people

    Open Access•Marco Verschoor•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2014

  • The All Affected Principle, and the weighting of votes

    Open Access•Kim Angell, Robert Huseby•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2020

  • Defining the demos

    Open Access•Ben Saunder, Ben Saunders•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2011

  • The Responses of Populism to Dahl's Democratic Dilemmas

    Open Access•Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser•Political Studies•2014

  • The global dimension of domestic regulatory agencies

    Open Access•Indira Latorre•Journal of International…•2024

  • A matter of principle? AI alignment as the fair treatment of claims

    Open Access•Ingeborg Gabriel, Geoff Keeling•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • The Demos and Its Critics

    Open Access•Aaron Maltais, Jonas Hultin Rosenberg et al.•The Review of Politics•2019

  • Democratic representation and democratic sanctions

    Chiara Fumagalli•Representation•2018

  • Scottish Independence and the All-Affected Interests Principle

    Open Access•Ben Saunder•Politics•2013

  • Authority and Immigration

    Open Access•David Miller•Political Studies•2023

  • Who Are the People? Defining the Demos in the Measurement of Democracy

    Open Access•Mathias Koenig-Archibugi•Political Studies•2022

  • From Government to Governance

    Open Access•Matthias Lievens•Political Studies•2015

  • Differential Voting Weights and Relational Egalitarianism

    Open Access•Andreas Bengtson•Political Studies•2020

  • The All-Affected Principle and the Question of Asymmetry

    Open Access•Andreas Bengtson•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • No Global Demos, No Global Democracy? A Systematization and Critique

    Open Access•Laura Valentini•Perspectives on Politics•2014

  • Scaling Democracy

    Open Access•Thea Riofrancos, Thea N Riofrancos•Perspectives on Politics•2017

  • After the revolution

    Robert Alan Dahl•After the revolution•1970

  • Two Cheers for Cosmopolitanism

    Open Access•Max Pensky•Journal of Social Philosophy•2007

  • Globalization and Democratization

    Open Access•Margaret Moore•Journal of Social Philosophy•2006

  • Another Cosmopolitanism

    Seyla Benhabib, Robert Post•Another cosmopolitanism•2006

  • Democracy Counts

    Open Access•Sofia Näsström•Transnational Actors in Global…•2010

  • The Rights of Others

    Open Access•Seyla Benhabib•Rights of Others•2004

  • Self-Determination beyond Sovereignty

    Open Access•Carol C Gould•Journal of Social Philosophy•2006

  • Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights

    Open Access•Carol C Gould•Globalizing Democracy and Human…•2004

  • The Problem of Global Justice

    Open Access•Thomas Nagel•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2005

  • Inclusion and Democracy

    Iris Marion Young•Readings in Planning Theory•2015

  • Aversive Democracy

    Open Access•Aletta J Norval•Aversive Democracy•2007

  • Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy

    Gaël Fain, Joseph Alois Schumpeter et al.•Capitalism, socialism, and…•2010

  • Philosophy and Real Politics

    Raymond Geuss•Philosophy and Real Politics•2008

  • Republicanism

    Philip Pettit•Republicanism•1999

  • The principle of constituted identities and the obligation to include

    Open Access•RogersM Smith•Ethics & Global Politics•2008

  • Globalizing the democratic community

    Open Access•Jens Bartelson•Ethics & Global Politics•2008

  • Should Expatriates Vote

    Open Access•Claudio López-Guerra, Claudio López‐guerra•Journal of Political Philosophy•2005

  • Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World

    Nancy Fraser•New left review•2005

  • Reimagining Political Community

    G John Ikenberry, Daniele Archibugi et al.•Foreign Affairs•1999

  • What Globalization Overshadows

    Open Access•Sofia Näsström•Political Theory•2003

  • Constitutional Democracy

    Open Access•Jürgen Habermas•Political Theory•2001

  • Democratic Theory and Border Coercion

    Open Access•Arash Abizadeh•Political Theory•2008

  • The Legitimacy of the People

    Open Access•Sofia Näsström•Political Theory•2007

  • Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives

    Open Access•Robert E Goodin•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2007

  • Cosmopolitanism and Discourse Ethics

    Pablo Gilabert•New Political Science•2006

  • A Dogma of Democratic Theory and Globalization

    Open Access•Hans Agné•European Journal of International…•2006

  • Democracy across Borders

    James Bohman•Democracy Across Borders•2007

  • Between Decision and Deliberation

    Open Access•Bonnie Honig, Bonnie Honig•American Political Science Review•2007

  • Citizenship and Voting Rights

    Ludvig Beckman•Citizenship Studies•2006

  • Between Facts and Norms

    Jürgen Habermas•Between Facts and Norms•1996

Unique citing works124
Citations per year7,75
Citation span2010 - 2026 (17)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 123

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae