Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Voting Rights of Senior Citizens

Should all Votes Count the Same

Bibliographic Data

ID21702003
AuthorsAndreas Bengtson (0000-0001-9224-8756, Aarhus University, corresponding author), Andreas Albertsen (0000-0001-7528-2493, Aarhus University)
Year2023
Publication date2023-10-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthical Theory and Moral Practice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1386-2820 • E-ISSN: 1572-8447
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10677-023-10417-w
OpenAlexW4387339863
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited43

In 1970, Stewart advocated disenfranchising everyone reaching retirement age or age 70, whichever was earlier. The question of whether senior citizens should be disenfranchised has recently come to the fore due to votes on issues such as Brexit and climate change. Indeed, there is a growing literature which argues that we should increase the voting power of non-senior citizens relative to senior citizens, for reasons having to do with intergenerational justice. Thus, it seems that there are reasons of justice to disenfranchise senior citizens, or at least to grant them a lower voting weight than non-senior citizens. In this paper, we investigate whether there are democratic reasons to do so. To answer this question, we turn to the boundary problem in democratic theory, i.e., the question of who should be included in democratic decision-making. Two prominent solutions, and a more recent one, are particularly relevant: the all-affected principle, the all-subjected principle, and the relational egalitarian principle. When it comes to the all-affected principle and the all-subjected principle, we argue that there is reason to grant most senior citizens a lower voting weight than most non-senior citizens in most decisions. Whether that is the case on the relational egalitarian principle depends on how people relate to each other in society. Indeed, it is sometimes in accordance with the relational egalitarian view to grant senior citizens a greater voting weight than non-senior citizens

Democracy · Economic Justice · Law and economics · Philosophy of medicine · Political economy · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Turnout · Voting · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Preference Intensity, Age-Weighted Votes, and the Democratic Empowerment of Young Citizens

    Open Access•Marco Miglino•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2025

  • Intergenerational harm and injustice in ageing democracies

    Open Access•Nicola Mulkeen•Critical Review of International…•2025

  • Expressive Theories of Law

    Elizabeth S Anderson, Elizabeth Anderson et al.•University of Pennsylvania Law…•2000

  • What Is the Point of Equality?

    Elizabeth S Anderson, Liz Anderson•Ethics•1999

  • Why the All-Affected Principle Is Groundless

    Andreas Bengtson, Kasper Lippert‐rasmussen et al.•Journal of Moral Philosophy•2021

  • Democracy and Its Critics

    Jan Narveson, Philosophy Documentation Center•Teaching Philosophy•1990

  • The Problem(s) of Constituting the Demos

    Open Access•Kasper Lippert‐rasmussen, Andreas Bengtson•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2021

  • Radical Democratic Inclusion

    Open Access•Martin O’neill•Royal Institute of Philosophy…•2022

  • Finding a fundamental principle of democratic inclusion

    Open Access•Andreas Bengtson•Inquiry•2026

  • Relational Equality and the Expressive Dimension of State Action

    KRISTIN VOIGT•Social Theory and Practice•2018

  • Justice, Symmetry, and Voting Rights Ceilings

    Open Access•Alexandru Volacu•Theoria•2021

  • Relational Egalitarianism

    Open Access•Kasper Lippert‐rasmussen, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen•Relational Egalitarianism•2018

  • The boundary problem in democratic theory

    Open Access•Sarah Song•International Theory•2012

  • Enfranchising all subjected, worldwide

    Open Access•Robert E Goodin•International Theory•2016

  • Ideal vs. Non‐ideal Theory

    Open Access•Laura Valentini•Philosophy Compass•2012

  • Constituting the polity, constituting the demos

    Open Access•D Owens•Ethics & Global Politics•2012

  • Representing future generations

    D F Thompson•Critical Review of International…•2010

  • Giving a Voice to Posterity – Deliberative Democracy and Representation of Future People

    Open Access•Kristian Skagen Ekeli•Journal of Agricultural and…•2005

  • Should Expatriates Vote

    Open Access•Claudio López-Guerra, Claudio López‐guerra•Journal of Political Philosophy•2005

  • Democracy and Proportionality

    Open Access•Harry Brighouse, Marc Fleurbaey•Journal of Political Philosophy•2008

  • Including the Unaffected

    Open Access•Michael L Frazer•Journal of Political Philosophy•2013

  • Distributive and relational equality

    Open Access•Christian Schemmel•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2011

  • The All Affected Principle, and the weighting of votes

    Open Access•Kim Angell, Robert Huseby•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2020

  • Against reviving republicanism

    Open Access•Geoffrey Brennan, Geoffrey H Brennan et al.•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2006

  • Democratic Theory and Border Coercion

    Open Access•Arash Abizadeh•Political Theory•2008

  • The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle

    Open Access•Sofia Näsström•Political Studies•2011

  • Differential Voting Weights and Relational Egalitarianism

    Open Access•Andreas Bengtson•Political Studies•2020

  • The Disfranchisement of the Elderly, and Other Attempts to Secure Intergenerational Justice

    Open Access•Philippe Van Parijs•Philosophy & Public Affairs•1998

  • Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives

    Open Access•Robert E Goodin•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2007

  • Democracy's Domain

    Open Access•David Miller•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2009

  • Democratic Equality and Political Authority

    Open Access•Daniel Viehoff•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2014

  • Rule Over None II

    Open Access•Niko Kolodny•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2014

  • Too old to vote? A democratic analysis of age-weighted voting

    Open Access•Andrei Poama, Alexandru Volacu•European Journal of Political…•2023

  • The Boundary Problem and the Ideal of Democracy

    Open Access•Eva Erman•Constellations•2014

  • Democracy and Equality

    Steven Wall•The Philosophical Quarterly•2007

  • Plural Voting for the Twenty-First Century

    Thomas Mulligan•The Philosophical Quarterly•2018

  • On the Demos and Its Kin

    Open Access•Arash Abizadeh•American Political Science Review•2012

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae