The Voting Rights of Senior Citizens
Should all Votes Count the Same
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21702003 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andreas Bengtson (0000-0001-9224-8756, Aarhus University, corresponding author), Andreas Albertsen (0000-0001-7528-2493, Aarhus University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1386-2820 • E-ISSN: 1572-8447 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10677-023-10417-w |
| OpenAlex | W4387339863 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 43 |
In 1970, Stewart advocated disenfranchising everyone reaching retirement age or age 70, whichever was earlier. The question of whether senior citizens should be disenfranchised has recently come to the fore due to votes on issues such as Brexit and climate change. Indeed, there is a growing literature which argues that we should increase the voting power of non-senior citizens relative to senior citizens, for reasons having to do with intergenerational justice. Thus, it seems that there are reasons of justice to disenfranchise senior citizens, or at least to grant them a lower voting weight than non-senior citizens. In this paper, we investigate whether there are democratic reasons to do so. To answer this question, we turn to the boundary problem in democratic theory, i.e., the question of who should be included in democratic decision-making. Two prominent solutions, and a more recent one, are particularly relevant: the all-affected principle, the all-subjected principle, and the relational egalitarian principle. When it comes to the all-affected principle and the all-subjected principle, we argue that there is reason to grant most senior citizens a lower voting weight than most non-senior citizens in most decisions. Whether that is the case on the relational egalitarian principle depends on how people relate to each other in society. Indeed, it is sometimes in accordance with the relational egalitarian view to grant senior citizens a greater voting weight than non-senior citizens
Democracy · Economic Justice · Law and economics · Philosophy of medicine · Political economy · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Turnout · Voting · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Expressive Theories of Law
What Is the Point of Equality?
Why the All-Affected Principle Is Groundless
Democracy and Its Critics
The Problem(s) of Constituting the Demos
Radical Democratic Inclusion
Finding a fundamental principle of democratic inclusion
Relational Equality and the Expressive Dimension of State Action
Justice, Symmetry, and Voting Rights Ceilings
Relational Egalitarianism
The boundary problem in democratic theory
Enfranchising all subjected, worldwide
Ideal vs. Non‐ideal Theory
Constituting the polity, constituting the demos
Representing future generations
Giving a Voice to Posterity – Deliberative Democracy and Representation of Future People
Should Expatriates Vote
Democracy and Proportionality
Including the Unaffected
Distributive and relational equality
The All Affected Principle, and the weighting of votes
Against reviving republicanism
Democratic Theory and Border Coercion
The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle
Differential Voting Weights and Relational Egalitarianism
The Disfranchisement of the Elderly, and Other Attempts to Secure Intergenerational Justice
Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives
Democracy's Domain
Democratic Equality and Political Authority
Rule Over None II
Too old to vote? A democratic analysis of age-weighted voting
The Boundary Problem and the Ideal of Democracy
Democracy and Equality
Plural Voting for the Twenty-First Century
On the Demos and Its Kin
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |