Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Radical Democratic Inclusion

Why We Should Lower the Voting Age to 12

Bibliographic Data

ID21692809
AuthorsMartin O’neill (0000-0003-0487-0196, University of York, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume91
Pages185-212
Publication date2022-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRoyal Institute of Philosophy Supplement (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1358-2461 • E-ISSN: 1755-3555
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s135824612200008x
OpenAlexW4225726777
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited23

Democratic societies such as the United Kingdom have come to fail their young citizens, often sacrificing their interests in a political process that gives much greater weight to the preferences and interests of older citizens. Against this background of intergenerational injustice, this article presents the case for a shift in the political system in the direction of radical democratic inclusion of younger citizens, through reducing the voting age to 12. This change in the voting age can be justified directly, with reference to the status, interests, and capacities of younger citizens, and it can also be justified as a remedy to existing forms of intergenerational injustice. This change in the voting age would require a parallel transformation in the role of secondary schools as part of the ‘critical infrastructure' of a democratic society, which would be part of a broader shift towards a more genuinely democratic political culture. The proposal is defended against less radical alternatives (such as votes at 16) and more radical alternatives (such as votes for younger children). The article concludes with some reflections on democracy and intergenerational justice in light of the Covid pandemic and the climate emergency

Democracy · Economic Justice · Inclusion (mineral) · Injustice · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Voting · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Australian young people’s perceptions of the commercial determinants of the climate crisis

    Open Access•Grace Arnot, Sabrina Lynette Thomas et al.•Health Promotion International•2023

  • Zukünftige Bürger

    Open Access•Andreas Busen•Diskurs Kindheits- und…•2026

  • The Voting Rights of Senior Citizens

    Open Access•Andreas Bengtson, Andreas Albertsen•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2023

  • “Our Voice Matters … If They Allow It”

    Pedro Hernando Maldonado Castañeda•Journal of Human Development•2025

  • Justice Between Coexisting Generations

    Open Access•Anna Elisabetta Galeotti•Global Policy•2026

  • Empowering the young in an aging democracy

    Open Access•Enrico Biale, Gloria Zuccarelli•Critical Review of International…•2025

  • Age-group representation as responsiveness

    Open Access•Ana Solano Campos•Critical Review of International…•2025

  • Introduction. The challenges of ageing societies

    Open Access•Anna Elisabetta Galeotti•Critical Review of International…•2025

  • Intergenerational harm and injustice in ageing democracies

    Open Access•Nicola Mulkeen•Critical Review of International…•2025

  • Debating the Voting Age

    Valere Gaspard•The American Review of Canadian…•2024

  • The Political Maturity of Youths and Young Adults

    Open Access•Robin Gut, Juri Ezzaini et al.•Swiss Political Science Review•2025

  • Justice as Fairness

    John Rawls, Erin Kelly•Justice As Fairness•2001

  • Capital in the Twenty-First Century

    Thomas Piketty•Capital in the Twenty-First Century•2014

  • Creating Citizens

    Eamonn Callan•Creating citizens•1997

  • Justice and Egalitarian Relations

    Christian Schemmel•Justice and Egalitarian Relations•2021

  • A Theory of Justice

    Open Access•John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1999

  • Philosophy and Public Affairs

    Open Access•J S Haldane, Samuel Brittan et al.•Philosophy and Public Affairs•2000

  • Disadvantage

    J Wolff, Avner De-Shalit et al.•Disadvantage•2007

  • The Frontiers of Democracy

    Open Access•Ludvig Beckman•Frontiers of Democracy•2009

  • Property‐Owning Democracy

    Open Access•Martin O’neill, Thad Williamson•Property-owning democracy•2012

  • Political interest of adolescents before and after lowering the voting age

    Eva Zeglovits, Martina Zandonella•Journal of Youth Studies•2013

  • Survey Article

    Open Access•Martin O’neill•Journal of Political Philosophy•2017

  • Justice, Power, and Participatory Socialism

    Open Access•Martin O’neill•Analyse & Kritik•2021

  • Shutdown

    Open Access•Robert Fredona•The Business History Review•2022

  • Why the voting age should be lowered to 16

    Open Access•Tommy Peto•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2017

  • Should the Voting Age be Lowered to Sixteen? Normative and Empirical Considerations

    Open Access•Tak Wing Chan, Matthew Clayton•Political Studies•2006

  • What Should Egalitarians Believe

    Open Access•Martin O’neill, Martin O''Neill et al.•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2008

  • Does Voting History Matter? Analysing Persistence in Turnout

    Open Access•Keith Denny, Kevin Denny et al.•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Voting May Be Habit‐Forming

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber, Donald P Green et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Becoming a Habitual Voter

    Open Access•Eric Plutzer•American Political Science Review•2002

Unique citing works11
Citations per year3,67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae