Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

More or less than human? Evaluating the role of AI-as-participant in online qualitative research

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12733227
AutoresAlexandra Gibson (0000-0002-9976-964X, Victoria University of Wellington, autor de correspondencia), A Beattie (0000-0001-8537-7672, Victoria University of Wellington)
Año2024
Volumen21
Número2
Páginas175-199
Fecha de publicación2024-02-05
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaQualitative Research in Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1478-0887 • E-ISSN: 1478-0895
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14780887.2024.2311427
OpenAlexW4391542643
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas12
Referencias citadas32

Artificial intelligence (AI) has an increasing presence in scholarship, posing new challenges and opportunities for qualitative researchers. Generative AI, such as Chat-GPT, can supposedly produce humanlike responses, which has implications for online qualitative research, which relies on human participation. In this paper, we contribute to debates about AI as a research participant ('AI-as-participant') and the threat of imposter participation in qualitative research. We share our unexpected encounter with AI during our story completion study on mobile dating during the COVID-19 pandemic and discuss how we identified AI responses within our dataset. Central to our analysis was our theoretical grounding of feminist new materialism, which attuned us to the affective and discursive qualities of our participant data. Using our theoretical lens, in tandem with other strategies, we examined the affective forces that signalled stark differences between previous, human-generated data and that of the current study. Analysing the discursive construction of narratives further alerted us to the absence of humans within our data. We conclude that AI cannot sufficiently replicate affect or capture the richness of human experience that is central to qualitative research, and offer recommendations for future researchers to anticipate and check for AI as an unwelcome research participant

Epistemology · Participant observation · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Philosophy · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Applications · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics

  • AI contributions to participant psychological wellbeing and agency

    Open Access•John C Hayvon•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2026

  • Artificial-Intelligence-Mediated Contamination in Online Research

    Open Access•Zhicheng Lin•Advances in Methods and Practices…•2026

  • AI-Supported Participatory Workshops

    Open Access•Martin Tomitsch, Joel Fredericks et al.•Urban Planning•2025

  • Navigating the Rise of Artificial Intelligence and Imposter Participants in Qualitative Health Research

    Open Access•Sam Quinn, Naomi Richards et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Authenticity in Question

    Open Access•A Santinele Martino, Kristen Hardy•Sociological Research Online•2026

  • Enhancing qualitative inquiry

    Huan Chen, Ye Wang et al.•Qualitative Research Journal•2025

  • Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Federica Dellafiore, Andreina Saba et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2026

  • The AI-Reflexivity Checklist (ARC)

    Open Access•Andrew Prahl•Qualitative Health Research•2026

  • It might be able to produce a text, but it’s not able to produce knowledge

    Foley, Maria Dempsey et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2025

  • Scammer Participants and AI-Assisted Interviews in Qualitative Health Research

    Open Access•Gamze Kaplan, Shruti Garg et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Craft of Qualitative Health Research

    Open Access•J Monforte•Qualitative Health Research•2025

  • Do You Know Who You're Talking To? Methodological Reflections on Maintaining Inclusivity and Research Integrity When Responding to Inauthentic Encounters in Online Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Brandi Lee Lough Dennell, A Dowrick et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • Adapting research methodology during Covid-19

    Open Access•Sarah Dodd, Alexandra Claudia Hess•Journal of Service Management•2021

  • Can AI language models replace human participants?

    Open Access•Danica Dillion, Niket Tandon et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2023

  • Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3

    Open Access•Marcel Binz, Emily Schulz et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2023

  • Detecting, Preventing, and Responding to “Fraudsters” in Internet Research

    Open Access•Jennifer E F Teitcher, Jennifer Teitcher et al.•Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics•2015

  • Fighting Covid-19 with the team of 5 million

    Open Access•A Beattie, Rebecca Priestley•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2021

  • Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyze large qualitative text datasets to inform the Covid-19 pandemic response

    Open Access•Lauren B Towler, Lauren Towler et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Ensuring survey research data integrity in the era of internet bots

    Open Access•Marybec Griffin, Richard J Martino et al.•Quality & Quantity•2022

  • ‘Take ownership of your condition’

    Alexandra Gibson, Alexandra Farren Gibson et al.•Health Risk & Society•2015

  • ‘Imposter participants’ in online qualitative research, a new and increasing threat to data integrity

    Open Access•Damien Ridge, Laurna Bullock et al.•Health Expectations•2023

  • Fickle focus

    Open Access•Paasonen, Susanna Paasonen•First Monday•2016

  • Qualitative story completion

    Braun, Victoria Clarke et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2018

  • Australian women’s use of health and fitness apps and wearable devices

    D Lupton•Feminist Media Studies•2019

  • Risk and emotion

    D Lupton•Health Risk & Society•2013

  • Internet Recruitment and E-Mail Interviews in Qualitative Studies

    Open Access•Rebekah J Hamilton, Rebekah Hamilton et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2006

  • The more-than-human sensorium

    D Lupton, Sarah Maslen•The Senses and Society•2018

  • Toward a More-Than-Human Analysis of Digital Health

    Open Access•D Lupton•Qualitative Health Research•2019

  • Beyond the challenge to research integrity

    K Drysdale, Nathanael Wells et al.•Health Sociology Review•2023

  • Me and the Machines

    Open Access•Laura A Chubb•International Journal of…•2023

  • The New Materialism and Sexual Difference

    Gill Jagger•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2015

Obras citantes distintas12
Citas por año12
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 11
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae