Cognitive, Emotional and Excitative Responses to Satirical News
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12749385 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ellen Droog (0000-0002-9852-7470, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, corresponding author), Christian Burgers (0000-0002-5652-9021, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), David L Mann (0000-0001-7476-6939, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 913-937 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Mass Communication & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1520-5436 • E-ISSN: 1532-7825 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/15205436.2022.2035398 |
| OpenAlex | W4210357489 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 46 |
While satirical news has the potential to sway viewers’ political opinions, empirical evidence for these effects remains mixed. Although some studies have shown that satire consumption results in viewer attitudes being more in line with satirists’ positions, other studies did not. A possible explanation for these conflicting findings is the lack of clarity about the mediating processes that play a role in this relationship. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the degree to which both self-reported as well as physiological cognitive, emotional, and excitative responses influence viewers’ attitudes when watching satirical news. We conducted a lab experiment in which participants watched either three satirical or three regular news videos about the same topics. Results showed that satire affected viewers’ self-reported and physiological cognitive, emotional and excitative responses. Nevertheless, viewers’ attitudes were mainly impacted through an affective rather than a cognitive or excitative route. More specifically, only positive emotions mediated the relationship between satirical (vs. regular) news on message-congruent attitudes, but in two opposite directions, which suppressed an overall direct effect on viewers’ attitudes. This indicates the need to differentiate between emotions with the same valence when studying effects of satirical news
CLARITY · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Emotional valence · Empirical evidence · Valence (chemistry · Humor Studies and Applications · Media Influence and Health · Media, Gender, and Advertising · Psychology · Social Psychology
Psychophysiological Measurement and Meaning
Emotion And Adaptation
Contributions of Psychophysiology to Media Research
Television is "easy" and print is "tough"
A meta-analysis of humor in advertising
The Privileged Role of the Late-Night Joke
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
How Satirical News Impacts Affective Responses, Learning, and Persuasion
The Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model
At Odds
Using the Limited Capacity Model of Motivated Mediated Message Processing to Design Effective Cancer Communication Messages
Just Laugh! You Dont Need to Remember
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
The Relative Trustworthiness of Inferential Tests of the Indirect Effect in Statistical Mediation Analysis
Defining “Fake News”
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect
The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing
Applying mass communication frameworks to study humor's impact
Humor Works in Funny Ways
Toward a Theory of Entertainment Persuasion
All Joking Aside
The Case for Emphasizing Discrete Emotions in Communication Research
Mechanisms Underlying the Effects of Sexy and Humorous Content in Advertisements
Motivated message processing
No Joke
Making news funny
Physiological Arousal and Political Beliefs
News, Politics, and Negativity
The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components
Talking About What Provokes Us
The Daily Show Effect
Adding Nuance to the Study of Political Humor Effects
A Priest, a Rabbi, and a Minister Walk into a Bar
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |