Cyber Diplomacy through Official Public Attribution
Paving the Way for Global Norms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12758279 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gil Baram (0000-0002-0384-612X, Bar-Ilan University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 391-411 |
| Publication date | 2024-10-12 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Studies Perspectives (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1528-3577 • E-ISSN: 1528-3585 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/isp/ekae022 |
| OpenAlex | W4404495694 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 44 |
International discussions on establishing and implementing norms for behavior in cyberspace have spanned over two decades. However, differences in what constitutes ‘acceptable conduct’ have hindered progress in forming these norms. In recent years, Western countries have adopted a strategy to signal what is considered unacceptable behavior by publicly attributing cyberattacks and intrusions. I argue that this act of official public attribution serves as a practice for countries to express their disapproval of inappropriate cyberspace behavior and condemnation and can cumulatively shape international practices, holding the attacking state accountable. I explore this by (1) analyzing new data from the European Repository of Cyber Incidents, which shows patterns of official public attributions for the years 2000–2023, providing exploratory directions and trends, and (2) examining the Iranian cyberattack against Albania in 2022 and its subsequent official public attributions as an illustrative case study. I demonstrate how repeated instances of official public attribution can contribute to the development of a common practice that signals dissatisfaction of a specific behavior. As state-sponsored cyberattacks and intrusions are on the rise, this practice could have an accumulative effect
Attribution · Diplomacy · Political science · Public Diplomacy · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Information and Cyber Security · Psychology · Law · Social Psychology
Digital Diplomacy and Cyber Defence
Nonproliferation Norms
Escalation firebreaks in the cyber, conventional, and nuclear domains
Digital sovereignty
The pursuit of positive accountability in the cyber domain
SorryNotSorry
Public Secrets
Norm Sabotage
Leveling the Playing Field
Bytes, bombs, and spies
Things We Lost in the Fire
Authoritarian multilateralism in the global cyber regime complex
A Cyberwar of Ideas? Deterrence and Norms in Cyberspace
Contested public attributions of cyber incidents and the role of academia
Beyond Naming and Shaming
Advanced persistent threats and the “big four”
Attributing Cyber Attacks
Publicly attributing cyber attacks
The End of Cyber Norms
Constructing Norms for Global Cybersecurity
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
The Nuclear Taboo
Deterrence with Imperfect Attribution
| Citations per year | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |