Parallels and Alliances
The Lived Experiences of Young, Disabled Bisexual People
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12759266 |
|---|---|
| Authors | A Toft (0000-0003-3734-2242, Nottingham Trent University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 183-201 |
| Publication date | 2020-04-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Bisexuality (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1529-9716 • E-ISSN: 1529-9724 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/15299716.2020.1774460 |
| OpenAlex | W3035883764 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 62 |
Young people (16–25) who identify as bisexual and disabled have to work against dominant forces of homo/heteronormativity and ableism which regulate sexuality and normalcy. Their lives demonstrate the complex negotiations that must be enacted in order to reside within such restrictive confines. This article uses the lived experience of 15 young (16–25 years) disabled and bisexual identified persons to understand how such identities intersect. Throughout, the voices of young people are centered in order to ensure that their experiences guide the article. Exploration of such life-stories highlights parallels between bisexual and disabled experiences, particularly in terms of misconceptions, erasure/invisibility and how dominant forces are resisted. The article suggests that a bisexual/disabled alliance is potentially fruitful for gaining a more nuanced and detailed understanding of sexuality and disability
Ableism · Alliance · Disability studies · Heteronormativity · Human sexuality · Invisibility · Life course approach · Lived experience · Negotiation · Parallels · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Queer · Social science · Sociology · Disability Rights and Representation · Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies · Gender Studies · Law · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Disability Theory
Sexual Fluidity in Male and Females
The Epistemic Contract of Bisexual Erasure 1
Disabled Sexuality
The Oxford handbook of theology, sexuality and gender
Notes on Natural Worlds, Disabled Bodies, and a Politics of Cure
Social Work with Disabled People
Theorizing multi-partner relationships and sexualities – Recent work on non-monogamy and polyamory
Crip Theory
The Spectre of Promiscuity
Desire Work
Telling Sexual Stories
Mental Handicap and Sexuality
Bisexuality, social identity, and well-being
Postmodern Bisexuality
Telling a poor man he can become rich
Productive pleasures across binary regimes
‘You're not sure that you are gay yet’
Negative identity experiences of bisexual and other non-monosexual people
Comparing perceived experiences of prejudice among self-identified plurisexual individuals
Misrecognition and managing marginalisation
Young disabled and LGBT
Which Sexuality? Which Service?”
British Bisexuality
Keeping Bisexuality Alive
Under the Bisexual Umbrella
Between a Gay and a Straight Place
A Qualitative Examination of Bisexual+ Identity Invalidation and Its Consequences for Wellbeing, Identity, and Relationships
Defining Bisexuality
Inactionable/Unspeakable
Shady Characters, Untrustworthy Partners, and Promiscuous Sluts
Guidelines for Researching and Writing About Bisexuality
Metropolitan Bisexual Men's Relationships
Creating a Bisexual Display
I was and still am”
Dis/entangling critical disability studies
Recognising and responding to young people with learning disabilities who experience, or are at risk of, child sexual exploitation in the UK
The Epistemic Contract of Bisexual Erasure
Using thematic analysis in psychology
What's so 'critical' about critical disability studies
It's not my business
Intersectionality as buzzword
Essentialist Beliefs About Homosexuality Predict Positive and Negative Behavioral Intentions Toward Lesbian Women and Gay Men
We Exist
Getting "Bi" in the Family
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,83 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |