Which States Will Restrict Abortions? Predictions from Votes in the House of Representatives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12782873 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephan F Gohmann (0000-0002-6496-5296, Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom), corresponding author), Robert L Ohsfeldt (0000-0002-6117-056X, Department of Health Services) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 19-38 |
| Publication date | 1994-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Policy Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1541-132X • E-ISSN: 1541-1338 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1994.tb00577.x |
| OpenAlex | W2026823555 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
In response to the Supreme Court's rulings in Webster v. Reproductive Services and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, which increased the ability of states to restrict abortions, many state legislatures have reexamined their abortion policies. Several recent studies use a variety of methods to predict whether states will restrict abortion access. These studies have utilized congressional votes on abortion legislation, past state laws restricting abortions, or current attitudes by state legislators and governors. Each method has its merits and limitations. This paper uses recent votes in the states' House of Representatives pertaining to abortion issues to predict the likelihood of significant abortion restrictions. These results are compared with rankings from other recent studies
Abortion · Abortion law · Family planning · House of Representatives · Legislation · Legislature · Political science · Population · Pregnancy · Research methodology · Sociology · State (computer science · State legislature · Statistics · Supreme court · Variety (cybernetics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Demography · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Law · Reproductive Health and Contraception
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |