Response to “Procedural Justice and Policing
A Rush to Judgment?”
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12795269 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel S Nagin (0000-0003-0075-1851, Carnegie Mellon University, corresponding author), Cody W Telep (0000-0002-5558-8353, Arizona State University) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 55-58 |
| Publication date | 2017-02-22 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Annual Review of Law and Social Science (BOOK_SERIES) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1550-3585 • E-ISSN: 1550-3631 |
| Publisher | Annual Reviews (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120516-024409 |
| OpenAlex | W2579947985 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 8 |
We are heartened by Tom Tyler's concurrence with the key conclusion of our full essay that evidence of procedurally just treatment of citizens by police or other representatives of the criminal justice system altering citizen perceptions of legitimacy and legal compliance is in short supply. Our main point of disagreement with Tyler is on how this agreed-upon conclusion about the state of the evidence should be communicated to policy makers.
Acknowledgement · Compliance (psychology · Concurrence · Criminal justice · Criminology · Economic Justice · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Perception · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Criminal Law and Evidence · Law · Policing Practices and Perceptions · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |