Examining Data Repository Guidelines for Qualitative Data Sharing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12806860 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alison L Antes (0000-0002-2632-7701, Washington University in St. Louis), Heidi A Walsh (0000-0001-9447-6496, Washington University in St. Louis), Michelle Strait (0000-0002-0793-3351, Washington University in St. Louis), Cynthia Hudson‐Vitale (0000-0001-5581-5678, Washington University in St. Louis), James M Dubois (0000-0002-3712-7051, Washington University in St. Louis, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 61-73 |
| Publication date | 2017-12-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1556-2646 • E-ISSN: 1556-2654 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1556264617744121 |
| PMID | 29226747 |
| OpenAlex | W2774767462 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 25 |
Qualitative data provide rich information on research questions in diverse fields. Recent calls for increased transparency and openness in research emphasize data sharing. However, qualitative data sharing has yet to become the norm internationally and is particularly uncommon in the United States. Guidance for archiving and secondary use of qualitative data is required for progress in this regard. In this study, we review the benefits and concerns associated with qualitative data sharing and then describe the results of a content analysis of guidelines from international repositories that archive qualitative data. A minority of repositories provide qualitative data sharing guidelines. Of the guidelines available, there is substantial variation in whether specific topics are addressed. Some topics, such as removing direct identifiers, are consistently addressed, while others, such as providing an anonymization log, are not. We discuss the implications of our study for education, best practices, and future research
Best practice · Computer security · Data collection · Data science · Data sharing · Identifier · Internet privacy · Knowledge management · Openness to experience · Political science · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Transparency (behavior · Unique identifier · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Computer Science · Data Analysis and Archiving · Medicine · Psychology
Understanding the sociology of customary law in the reformation era
A comprehensive guide to socio-ecological data for the LTSER platform Eisenwurzen
Recycling quotes or personal plagiarism? A methodological contribution on integrity in qualitative health research
Imago Dei and Peoplehood
Open qualitative data
Ethical Dilemmas in Qualitative Research
The Challenges of Data Sharing
Interrogating Datafication
Responsible Sharing of Qualitative Research Data
The Epistemological and Ethical Challenges of Archiving and Sharing Qualitative Data
The Sage Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry
Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
Promoting an open research culture
Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research
A systematic review of qualitative findings on factors enabling and deterring uptake of HIV testing in Sub-Saharan Africa
False-Positive Psychology
Is it time to share qualitative research data
Resistance to qual/quant parity
Qualitative data are not just quantitative data with text but data with context
Now’s not the time! Qualitative data repositories on tricky ground
Implementing Qualitative Data Management Plans to Ensure Ethical Standards in Multi-Partner Centers
Learning to manage and share data
Consensus methods
Publication, Publication
Ethical Issues in the Reuse of Qualitative Data
Anonymising interview data
Qualitative Researchers' Understandings of Their Practice and the Implications for Data Archiving and Sharing
Whose Data are They Anyway
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,43 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |