Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A New Measure of Research Participant Burden

Brief Report

Bibliographic Data

ID12807256
AuthorsJennifer H Lingler (University of Pittsburgh, corresponding author), Karen L Schmidt (0000-0002-5717-2933, University of Pittsburgh), Amanda Gentry (University of Pittsburgh), Lu Hu (0000-0003-3317-1925, University of Pittsburgh), Lauren Terhorst (0000-0001-6376-1470, University of Pittsburgh)
Year2014
Volume9
Issue4
Pages46-49
Publication date2014-08-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1556-2646 • E-ISSN: 1556-2654
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1556264614545037
PMID26125079
OpenAlexW2107583979
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited17

Effective conceptualizations of research burden should address indirect burdens related to research duration, intensity, and invasiveness. Introducing the concept of perceived research burden, we developed, tested, and validated a new instrument, the Perceived Research Burden Assessment (PeRBA). Initial psychometric evaluation of PeRBA reveals good internal consistency, evidence of face validity, and acceptable convergent and discriminant validity

Convergent validity · Data mining · Discriminant validity · External validity · Face validity · Internal consistency · Internal validity · Measure (data warehouse · Psychometrics · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Health Sciences Research and Education · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Rapid implementation mapping to identify implementation determinants and strategies for cervical cancer control in Nigeria

    Open Access•Ijeoma Uchenna Itanyi, Clare Viglione et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Transcending the Professional–Client Divide

    Open Access•Kathy Ellem, Louisa Smith et al.•Child and Adolescent Social Work…•2020

  • A public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person‐centred randomized clinical trial

    Open Access•Jacqueline Rix, Sharon Docherty et al.•Health Expectations•2021

  • A critique of the moral economy of pharmaceutical development

    Jonathan Kimmelman•Critical Policy Studies•2025

  • Creation of an Adapted Short‐Form Version of The Coping With Toddlers’ Negative Emotions Scale, an Emotion Socialization Measure for Parents of Toddlers

    Open Access•Gabriella King, Jo-Ann Macdonald et al.•Social Development•2025

  • Prioritizing participant safety in mental health research involving marginalized groups

    Open Access•Brianna Jackson, Victoria Smye et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2026

  • Mental health and wellbeing interventions for care-experienced children and young people

    Open Access•Sarah Macdonald, Rob Trubey et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2023

  • Dosing parameters for the effects of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on smoking cessation

    Open Access•Ellen Carl, Amylynn Liskiewicz et al.•BMC Psychology•2020

  • Increasing Physical Activity among Breast Cancer Survivors by Modulating Temporal Orientation with rTMS

    Open Access•Ellen Carl, Alina Shevorykin et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Understanding parental consent and trust in paediatric LRTI research

    Open Access•V Rizke Ciptaningtyas, Tanjung Ayu Sumekar et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • What’s in it for me? A process evaluation of the implementation of a mobile phone-supported intervention after stroke in Uganda

    Open Access•Minna Teriö, Gunilla Eriksson et al.•BMC Public Health•2019

  • Development and Preliminary Testing of the Perceived Benefit and Burden Scales for Cancer Clinical Trial Participation

    Open Access•Connie M Ulrich, Qiuping Zhou et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2018

  • Mindfully motivated

    Open Access•Aidan P J Smyth, Marina Milyavskaya•European Journal of Social…•2021

  • Conducting Qualitative Research to Respond to Covid-19 Challenges

    Open Access•Stéphanie Tremblay, Sonia Castiglione et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Attitudes and beliefs of african americans toward participation in medical research

    Giselle Corbie-Smith, Stephen B Thomas et al.•Journal of General Internal…•1999

  • Positive Events and Social Supports as Buffers of Life Change Stress 1

    Open Access•Sheldon Cohen, Harry M Hoberman•Journal of Applied Social…•1983

  • A New Brief Instrument for Assessing Decisional Capacity for Clinical Research

    Dilip V Jeste, BARTON W PALMER et al.•Archives of General Psychiatry•2007

  • Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease

    Open Access•Guy M Mckhann, Guy McKhann et al.•Neurology•1984

  • Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place

    Open Access•Sebastiaan Theodorus Michaël Peek, Katrien Luijkx et al.•Gerontology•2016

  • Current Concepts in Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Ronald C Petersen, Rachelle S Doody et al.•Archives of Neurology•2001

  • “Mini-mental state”

    Open Access•Marshal F Folstein, Susan E Folstein et al.•Journal of Psychiatric Research•1975

  • Respondent Burden in Clinical Research

    Connie M Ulrich, Gwenyth R Wallen et al.•IRB Ethics and Human Research•2005

  • African Americans' views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis study

    Open Access•Vicki S Freimuth, Sandra C Quinn et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2001

Unique citing works14
Citations per year1.75
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae