Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dogs in Funerary Practices of Bronze Age Populations of the Ural-Kazakhstan Steppes

The Case of Sintashta

Bibliographic Data

ID12819699
AuthorsP A Frikke (0000-0002-2830-4642), Emma Usmanova (0000-0003-1625-5086, Buketov Karaganda National Research University; Margulan Institute of Archaeology), E R Usmanova (Karaganda Buketov University), Pavel Kosintsev (0000-0002-0973-7426, Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences; Al-Farabi Kazakh National University), P A Kosintsev (Al-Farabi Kazakh National University)
Year2026
Volume54
Issue1
Pages34-43
Publication date2026-04-04
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchaeology Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1563-0110 • E-ISSN: 1531-832X
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.17746/1563-0110.2026.54.1.034-043
OpenAlexW7150903351
LanguageEN
References cited8

This article presents the results of a study of grave goods and the composition of sacrificial animals in burials of the Sintashta culture in the Ural-Kazakhstan steppes. Two burial samples (one including dogs and the other without dogs) were examined in order to test the hypothesis that individuals interred with dogs held a high social status. Particular attention is paid to the results of a correspondence analysis conducted to compare the funerary assemblages from 46 burials. Three groups of burials were identified. The first group comprises pits in which taluses constitute the most numerous finds. The second group includes burials characterized predominantly by ceramic vessels. The third group consists of graves containing multi-component assemblages. It has been demonstrated that in each group, so-called prestige items occur exclusively in burials with dogs. These items include bronze spearheads, bone spatulas, stone mace-heads, a bronze adze-axe (chekan), bone and bronze harpoons, as well as grinders and pestles. Additional indicators of high social status in burials with dogs include their location in the central part of a kurgan and the presence of pits associated with various elements of wheeled vehicles. Taken together, these features constitute recurring patterns of status-related characteristics, one of which is the inclusion of a dog in the burial rite. It is concluded that within the funerary practices of the Sintashta culture, the dog sacrifice was associated with a socially distinct group, provisionally defined as elite. We propose that this group includes herders and individuals connected with metal production. For representatives of these two economic spheres, the symbolic status of the dog held particular significance. The evidence suggests that the image of the dog was embedded in funerary practices and functioned as a symbol of protection over resources and people

Bronze · Bronze Age · Grave goods · Prestige · Sacrifice · Social status · Animal Diversity and Health Studies · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Eurasian Exchange Networks

  • Жертвоприношения животных синташтинской культуры бронзового века Южного Урала

    Open Access•A Yu Rassadnikov, E V Kupriyanova et al.•Kazakhstan Archeology•2023

  • People, dogs and wild game

    Open Access•Maria Bernabò Brea, Paola Mazzieri et al.•Documenta Praehistorica•2010

  • Subsistence and social change in central Eurasia

    Open Access•Alicia Ventresca-Miller, Emma Usmanova et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2013

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae