Voice, exit and efficacy
Dealing with perceived neighbourhood decline without moving out
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12820895 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marco Van Der Land (Delft University of Technology, corresponding author), Wenda Doff (Delft University of Technology) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 429-445 |
| Publication date | 2010-11-11 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1566-4910 • E-ISSN: 1573-7772 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10901-010-9197-2 |
| OpenAlex | W2009212193 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 20 |
| References cited | 13 |
Residents of deprived urban neighbourhoods with a changing population often experience an increase in insecurity. If they judge the change as decline, they are likely to become less satisfied with their residential situation and exhibit coping tactics. This paper combines Hirschman’s Exit, Voice and Loyalty theory with insights on personal and collective efficacy drawn mainly from the work of Bandura and Sampson in order to describe and interpret three coping tactics: (partly) withdraw, accept and adapt, and show voice. Neighbourhood loyalty can partly explain why residents choose a particular tactic. This loyalty relates to residents’ place attachment and local social ties, but can sometimes be more or less forced when it results from of a lack of possibilities to move away. Those who cannot or do not want to move tend to exit by withdrawing from places or people in the neighbourhood. Their coping tactics contribute to feelings of personal efficacy but might harm collective efficacy. Exit-based tactics are often accompanied by a high degree of distrust towards other residents and/or local formal institutions. The more residents deploy exit-based coping tactics and the higher the degree of distrust among residents, the higher the pressure on collective efficacy and social control mechanisms in the neighbourhood
Business · Collective efficacy · Coping (psychology · Distrust · Feeling · Harm · Loyalty · Neighbourhood (mathematics · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Homelessness and Social Issues · Place Attachment and Urban Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies · Marketing
The subjective dimension of residential segregation
Local Activism in Urban Neighborhood Governance
Understanding vulnerability and sustainable livelihood factors from coastal residents in Taiwan
Evaluation of Centres for the Integral Attention of Children in Dominican Republic (Cianis) and Local Community Organizations for Child Protection (LCOCP)
Beyond exit, voice, and loyalty
Doing and belonging
A qualitative study of disengagement in disadvantaged areas of the UK
Exploring local activism in the neighborhoods of Cairo
"Students "at Risk
The Application of Hirschman’s Exit-voice Framework to Housing Studies
A Systematic Review
Staying or moving? Residential reasoning among older adults living in rural and urban disadvantaged areas
Place Attachment Among Older Adults Living in Four Communities in Flanders, Belgium
How do neighbourhood perceptions interact with moving desires and intentions
The role of the perceived community social climate in explaining knowledge-workers staying intentions
Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect framework of residents' responses to urban neighborhood regeneration
Should I stay or should I go? Locational decisions and coping strategies of Turkish homeowners in low-income neighbourhoods
Moving Considerations of Middle-Class Residents in Dutch Disadvantaged Neighborhoods
Wishful Thinking and the Abandonment of Moving Desires over the Life Course
Citizens policing citizens
Disruptions in Place Attachment
Self-Efficacy
Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives
Exit, Voice, and Loyalty
Behavioural responses to neighbourhood reputations
Abwanderung, Widerspruch, Passivität. Oder
Consumers' Responses to Choice-based Letting Mechanisms
Exit, voice and loyalty
| Citations per year | 1.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Highly cited | No |