Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Three Men Make a Tiger

The Effect of Consensus Testimony on Chinese and U.S. Children’s Judgments about Possibility

Bibliographic Data

ID12823079
AuthorsJenny Nissel (0000-0001-7854-2545, The University of Texas at Austin, corresponding author), Hui Li (0000-0001-9355-1116, Central China Normal University), Amanda Cramer (Washington University in St. Louis), Jacqueline D Woolley (0000-0002-4384-7688, The University of Texas at Austin)
Year2023
Volume23
Issue1-2
Pages98-126
Publication date2023-04-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Cognition and Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1567-7095 • E-ISSN: 1568-5373
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/15685373-12340154
OpenAlexW4362671810
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited7

In this study, we ask whether consensus testimony affects children’s judgments of the possibility of improbable and impossible events. Fifty-six U.S. and Chinese 8-year-olds made possibility judgments before and after hearing three speakers affirm or deny the possibility of improbable and impossible events. Results indicated that whereas both U.S. and Chinese children altered their judgments in the direction of the consensus testimony, this effect was stronger for Chinese children. U.S. children were particularly receptive to consensus for improbable events and when the consensus provided correct information, whereas Chinese children were similarly willing to change their judgment regardless of event type and the validity of the testimony. We propose that the extent of the influence of testimony on possibility judgments varies based on cultural setting. Our findings have potential applications for domains that require evaluation of counterintuitive claims, like religious and scientific education

Cognitive psychology · Counterintuitive · Epistemology · Philosophy of mind · Scientific consensus · Child and Animal Learning Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Why wearing a yellow hat is impossible

    Open Access•Jenny Nissel, Jiaying Xu et al.•Cognition•2024

  • Asking God for Help

    Open Access•Nicholas J Shaman, Anondah Saide et al.•Religions•2023

  • Analyzing and Interpreting Data From Likert-Type Scales

    Gail M Sullivan, Anthony R Artino•Journal of Graduate Medical…•2013

  • Resolving the 50‐year debate around using and misusing Likert scales

    Open Access•James Carifio, Rocco J Perla et al.•Medical Education•2008

  • How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data

    Open Access•Spencer E Harpe•Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and…•2015

  • A Similarity Heuristic in Children’s Possibility Judgments

    Open Access•Brandon W Goulding, Ori Friedman•Child Development•2021

  • Young Children’s Deference to a Consensus Varies by Culture and Judgment Setting

    Kathleen H Corriveau, Elizabeth Kim et al.•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2013

  • Preschoolers (sometimes) defer to the majority in making simple perceptual judgments

    Kathleen H Corriveau, Paul L Harris•Developmental Psychology•2010

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae