Institutional interplay in global environmental governance
Lessons learned and future research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12823933 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joshua Philipp Elsässer (0000-0002-3638-5171, University of Potsdam, corresponding author), Thomas Hickmann (0000-0001-5072-7855, Lund University), Sikina Jinnah (0000-0003-4528-3000, University of California, Santa Cruz), Sebastian Oberthür (0000-0001-8626-5082, Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Thijs Van De Graaf (0000-0003-3372-3830, Ghent University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 373-391 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1567-9764 • E-ISSN: 1573-1553 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10784-022-09569-4 |
| OpenAlex | W4214853397 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 94 |
Over the past decades, the growing proliferation of international institutions governing the global environment has impelled institutional interplay as a result of functional and normative overlap across multiple regimes. This article synthesizes primary contributions made in research on institutional interplay over the past twenty years, with particular focus on publications with International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. Broadening our understanding about the different types, dimensions, pathways, and effects of institutional interplay, scholars have produced key insights into the ways and means by which international institutions cooperate, manage discord, engage in problem solving, and capture synergies across levels and scales. As global environmental governance has become increasingly fragmented and complex, we recognize that recent studies have highlighted the growing interactions between transnationally operating institutions in the wake of polycentric governance and hybrid institutional complexes. However, our findings reveal that there is insufficient empirical and conceptual research to fully understand the relationship, causes, and consequences of interplay between intergovernmental and transnational institutions. Reflecting on the challenges of addressing regulatory gaps and mitigating the crisis of multilateralism, we expound the present research frontier for further advancing research on institutional interplay and provide recommendations to support policy-making
Conceptual framework · Corporate governance · Economics · Environmental governance · Frontier · Global governance · Management · Multilateralism · Normative · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Climate Change Policy and Economics · International Development and Aid · Law · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
National environmental programs and local social-ecological system change in dryland China
Green Equals Green? The Divergent Policy Logics of Climate and Biodiversity Governance
Seizing a venue linking opportunity
The formation of responsibility for sustainable development
Innovations and Dilemmas in Global Forest Governance - The Tortuous Pathway toward a Deforestation-free World
Orchestrating initiatives at UN summits on sustainable development from 2000 to 2022
Making waves or ripples? The influence of the European Green Deal on the revised IMO GHG strategy
Mapping institutional deference in the marine biodiversity regime complex
The Longue Durée of International Environmental Norm Change
Orchestrating Global Climate Governance Through Data
Expert knowledge and institutional interplay
Systems-thinking for environmental policy coherence
Tracing water governance across different levels in Iran
Rethinking governance for the Global Biodiversity Framework
From silos to synergy
Lessons learnt from international environmental agreements for the Stockholm + 50 Conference
Through the prism of governance
Mapping governance interactions among the Paris Agreement and SDG1 in Sub-Saharan African countries
(Un)fair chase? Governing “conservation killing” in Africa and Europe
Institutionalizing climate change mitigation in the Global South
Whose risk counts? Climate risk frames in global green finance governance complex
Conservation funding from CBD COP15 and COP16
International Organizations as Orchestrators
Managers of Global Change
The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change
Transnational Climate Change Governance
Institutional Designs for a Complex World
The Opening Up of International Organizations
International regulation without international government
Reinvigorating International Climate Policy
Methodological Challenges in the Study of Regime Effectiveness
Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change
The Untold Story of the World's Leading Environmental Institution
The expanding field of cooperative initiatives for decarbonization
The fragmentation of the global climate governance architecture
Non‐state actors in hybrid global climate governance
Interplay management
Making initiatives resonate
The interaction of international institutions from a social network perspective
Policy coherence and interplay between Zambia’s forest, energy, agricultural and climate change policies and multilateral environmental agreements
The Sustainable Development Goals and Redd
New alliances in global environmental governance
Reforming International Environmental Governance
Competing Knowledge Systems in the Management of Fish and Forests in the Pacific Northwest
The Basel Convention, US politics, and the emergence of non-state e-waste recycling certification
Governing complexity
Filling the gap? An analysis of non-governmental organizations responses to participation and representation deficits in global climate governance
Mapping the fragmentation of the international forest regime complex
Environmental policy integration among multilateral environmental agreements
Managing fragmentation in global environmental governance
Transboundary river basin agreements in the Mekong and Zambezi basins
The devil lies in the definition
Overlapping International Regimes
Does orchestration in the Global Climate Action Agenda effectively prioritize and mobilize transnational climate adaptation action
Misappropriation of Institutions
Regime interplay in Arctic shipping governance
Managing North Sea Pollution Effectively
Clustering of Multilateral Environmental Agreements
Analysis of the governance architecture to regulate GHG emissions from international shipping
Beyond the public and private divide
The impact of environmental interest groups in international negotiations
International environmental law as a complex adaptive system
Cities to the rescue? Assessing the performance of transnational municipal networks in global climate governance
Trade Measures and Climate Compliance
The Role of Unep and UNDP in Multilateral Environmental Agreements
The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures
Overlap Management in the World Trade Organization
All Hands on Deck”
Mapping Institutional Linkages in European Air Pollution Politics
Marketing Linkages
Introduction
Take Action Now
The Comparative Politics of Transnational Climate Governance
Transnational Climate Governance Initiatives
Transnational Climate Governance Networks and Domestic Regulatory Action
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat as an orchestrator in global climate policymaking
The Politics of International Regime Complexity
The Regime Complex for Climate Change
Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance
Transnational Actors and Transnational Governance in Global Environmental Politics
Institutional Linkages in International Society
The Dynamics of Regime Complexes
Regime Complexes
The Causal Mechanisms of Interaction between International Institutions
Global democratization and international regime complexity
Unbundling the Regime Complex
Strengthening the Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change
Non-state actors in global climate governance
Secretariat Influence on Overlap Management Politics in North America
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 21 |