Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Can Digital Governance Training Harmonize Civil Servants’ Perceptions of AI Decision-Making? A Pre and Post-Test Design

Bibliographic Data

ID12839192
AuthorsHsini Huang (0000-0001-7546-1096, Hague Institute for Global Justice, corresponding author), Don‐yun Chen (0000-0003-4896-1524, National Chengchi University), Yuhan Chen (0009-0001-8510-3935, National Chengchi University)
Year2025
Volume31
Issue1
Pages61-80
Publication date2025-09-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInformation Polity (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1875-8754 • E-ISSN: 1570-1255
PublisherIOS Press (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1177/15701255251375826
OpenAlexW4414629903
LanguageEN
References cited73

Successful AI adoption and implementation in public organizations require new technological readiness and recalibration of civil servants’ attitudes and perceptions toward AI. This study utilizes a pretest-posttest survey design to assess the impact of digital governance training on Taiwanese civil servants’ perceptions of AI discretion, specifically examining perceptions of legality, efficiency, and fairness. Findings of this research identify diverse AI attitudes among public employees—optimistic, pessimistic, doubtful, and pragmatic—and assess how these attitudes influence their views on AI's legitimacy. Digital governance training serves as a strategic tool to recalibrate civil servants’ perceptions, particularly effective in mitigating pessimistic views. However, it can also intensify existing beliefs. Optimists tend to view AI's efficiency more positively post-training, whereas doubters become more skeptical about its legality. Overall, the findings suggest that training variably impacts civil servants’ perceptions of AI, highlighting that while it is not a quick remedy, it is a critical tool in managing and shaping administrative attitudes toward AI

Civil society · Corporate governance · Perception · Pessimism · Skepticism · Training (meteorology · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Regulation and Compliance Studies

  • Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government

    Aurélien Buffat•Public Management Review•2015

  • Risk and Innovation

    Louise Brown, Stephen P Osborne•Public Management Review•2013

  • Viewpoint

    Open Access•Katja Grace, John Salvatier et al.•Journal of Artificial Intelligence…•2018

  • Automation and discretion

    Open Access•Noortje De Boer, Nadine Raaphorst•Public Management Review•2023

  • The management of bias and noise in public sector decision-making

    Open Access•Nicola Belle, Paola Cantarelli et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • The complexities of digitization and street-level discretion

    Mohammad Alshallaqi•Public Management Review•2024

  • Implementing AI in the public sector

    Open Access•Ines Mergel, Helen Dickinson et al.•Public Management Review•2023

  • More than a digital system

    Open Access•Sarah Giest, Sarah N Giest et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • AI governance in the public sector

    Open Access•Maciej Kuziemski, Gianluca Misuraca•Telecommunications Policy•2020

  • A Closer Look at What Goes Wrong

    Eunju Rho, Juyong Jung et al.•International Journal of Public…•2021

  • Hybrid Data Competencies for Municipal Civil Servants

    Open Access•Justien Dingelstad, R T Borst et al.•Public Personnel Management•2022

  • Artificial Intelligence and Public Human Resource Management

    Open Access•Brad Johnson, Brad A M Johnson et al.•Public Personnel Management•2022

  • AI and bureaucratic discretion

    Open Access•Kate Vredenburgh•Inquiry•2025

  • In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Theo Araujo, Natali Helberger et al.•AI & Society•2020

  • Artificial Discretion as a Tool of Governance

    Open Access•Matthew Young, Justin B Bullock et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2019

  • Machine Intelligence, Bureaucracy, and Human Control

    Open Access•Justin B Bullock, Hsini Huang et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2022

  • Legitimacy of Algorithmic Decision-Making

    Open Access•Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, Albert Meijer et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2022

  • A framework of attitudes towards technology in theory and practice

    Open Access•Christian Kerschner, Melf-Hinrich Ehlers•Ecological Economics•2016

  • Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance

    Open Access•Anneke Zuiderwijk, Yu-Che Chen et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • How and where is artificial intelligence in the public sector going? A literature review and research agenda

    Open Access•Weslei Gomes de Sousa, Elis Regina Pereira de Melo et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • More E-Government, Less Street-Level Bureaucracy? On Legitimacy and the Human Side of Public Administration

    Gabriella Jansson, Gissur Ó Erlingsson•Journal of Information Technology…•2014

  • Street-Level Bureaucrats and Ethical Conflicts in Service Provision to Sex Workers

    Theresa Anasti•Ethics and Social Welfare•2019

  • Will Algorithms Blind People? The Effect of Explainable AI and Decision-Makers’ Experience on AI-supported Decision-Making in Government

    Open Access•Marijn Janssen, M H den Hartog et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2020

  • Resisting by workarounds

    Open Access•Hsini Huang, Calvin Zhou-Peng Liao et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2020

  • AI adoption and diffusion in public administration

    Open Access•Rohit Madan, Mona Ashok•Government Information Quarterly•2022

  • Opportunities and challenges of digitized discretionary practices

    Open Access•Peter André Busch, Helle Zinner Henriksen et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector

    Open Access•Tara Qian Sun, Rony Medaglia•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms

    Open Access•Antonio Cordella, Carla Bonina et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2012

  • Overcoming barriers to digital government

    Open Access•Christopher Wilson, Ines Mergel•Government Information Quarterly•2022

  • Techno-optimism and policy-pessimism in the public sector big data debate

    Open Access•Simon Vydra, Bram Klievink•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Artificial Intelligence, Discretion, and Bureaucracy

    Open Access•Justin B Bullock•The American Review of Public…•2019

  • The Concept of Regime Values

    Open Access•Patrick Overeem•The American Review of Public…•2013

  • Understanding the micro‐foundations of administrative corruption in the public sector

    Open Access•Kristina S Weißmüller, Anna Zuber•Public Administration Review•2023

  • Just like I thought’

    Open Access•Friso Selten, Marcel Robeer et al.•Public Administration Review•2023

  • From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies

    Open Access•Mark Bovens, Stavros Zouridis•Public Administration Review•2002

  • Of Bureaucrats and Passionate Public Managers

    Open Access•R E Meyer, Isabell Egger-Peitler et al.•Public Administration•2013

  • The effect of human versus automated interaction on willingness to participate in government programs

    Open Access•Susan M Miller, Miyeon Song et al.•Public Administration•2022

  • Political Control, Bureaucratic Discretion, and Public Commenting on Agency Regulations

    Open Access•Steven J Balla•Public Administration•2014

  • Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission

    Barry R Weingast, Mark J Moran•Journal of Political Economy•1983

  • What makes public sector innovations survive? An exploratory study of the influence of feedback, accountability and learning

    Open Access•Wouter van Acker, Geert Bouckaert•International Review of…•2018

  • The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution

    Open Access•Spyros Makridakis•Futures•2017

  • Raising Productivity in Higher Education

    Henry M Levin•The Journal of Higher Education•1991

  • The singularity is near

    Ray Kurzweil•The singularity is near•2005

  • Fiction and Imagination

    Howard E Mccurdy•Public Administration Review•1995

  • Bureaucracy and Democracy

    Kenneth J Meier•Public Administration Review•1997

  • Accountable Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Madalina Busuioc•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Carl J. Friedrich on Responsibility and Authority

    Open Access•Jeremy F Plant•Public Administration Review•2011

  • Interpreting Performance Information

    Open Access•Martin Baekgaard, Søren Serritzlew•Public Administration Review•2015

  • The Administrative State Revisited

    Dwight Waldo•Public Administration Review•1965

  • Legitimacy, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Public Administration in Sweden

    Open Access•J Pierre•International Political Science…•1993

  • Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations

    Fariborz Damanpour, Martin Schneider•Journal of Public Administration…•2009

  • Measuring Public Service Motivation

    Jay L Perry•Journal of Public Administration…•1996

  • Human–AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision Making

    Open Access•Saar Alon-Barkat, Madalina Busuioc•Journal of Public Administration…•2023

  • The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions

    Open Access•Tal Zarsky•Science Technology & Human Values•2016

  • The Study of Administration

    Open Access•Woodrow Wilson•Political Science Quarterly•1887

  • Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy

    Open Access•Benjamin R Barber•Political Science Quarterly•1998

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae